From: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <joe.liu@mediatek.com>,
<lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>,
<nsaenzju@redhat.com>, <vbabka@suse.cz>, <yj.chiang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: fix cma pageblock was stolen in rmqueue fallback
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 17:22:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230905092240.19132-1-lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230905090922.zy7srh33rg5c3zao@techsingularity.net>
Hi Mel,
Of course, because we only test for CMA and only make sure that
CMA part is wrong.
You patch is definitly better.
Please go ahead with your patch, thank you.
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:13:33PM +0800, Lecopzer Chen wrote:
> > commit 4b23a68f9536 ("mm/page_alloc: protect PCP lists with a
> > spinlock") fallback freeing page to free_one_page() if pcp trylock
> > failed. This make MIGRATE_CMA be able to fallback and be stolen
> > whole pageblock by MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE in the page allocation.
> >
> > PCP free is fine because free_pcppages_bulk() will always get
> > migratetype again before freeing the page, thus this only happen when
> > someone tried to put CMA page in to other MIGRATE_TYPE's freelist.
> >
> > Fixes: 4b23a68f9536 ("mm/page_alloc: protect PCP lists with a spinlock")
> > Reported-by: Joe Liu <joe.liu@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
> > Cc: Mark-pk Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
> > Cc: Joe Liu <joe.liu@mediatek.com>
>
> Sorry for the long delay and thanks Lecopzer for the patch.
>
> This changelog is difficult to parse but the fix may also me too specific
> and could be more robust against types other than CMA. It is true that
> a failed PCP acquire may return a !is_migrate_isolate page to the wrong
> list but it's more straight-forward to unconditionally lookup the PCP
> migratetype of the spinlock is not acquired.
>
> How about this? It unconditionally looks up the PCP migratetype after
> spinlock contention. It's build tested only
>
> --8<--
> mm: page_alloc: Free pages to correct buddy list after PCP lock contention
>
> Commit 4b23a68f9536 ("mm/page_alloc: protect PCP lists with a spinlock")
> returns pages to the buddy list on PCP lock contention. However, for
> migratetypes that are not MIGRATE_PCPTYPES, the migratetype may have
> been clobbered already for pages that are not being isolated. In
> practice, this means that CMA pages may be returned to the wrong
> buddy list. While this might be harmless in some cases as it is
> MIGRATE_MOVABLE, the pageblock could be reassigned in rmqueue_fallback
> and prevent a future CMA allocation. Lookup the PCP migratetype
> against unconditionally if the PCP lock is contended.
>
> [lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com: CMA-specific fix]
> Fixes: 4b23a68f9536 ("mm/page_alloc: protect PCP lists with a spinlock")
> Reported-by: Joe Liu <joe.liu@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 452459836b71..4053c377fee8 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2428,7 +2428,13 @@ void free_unref_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> free_unref_page_commit(zone, pcp, page, migratetype, order);
> pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
> } else {
> - free_one_page(zone, page, pfn, order, migratetype, FPI_NONE);
> + /*
> + * The page migratetype may have been clobbered for types
> + * (type >= MIGRATE_PCPTYPES && !is_migrate_isolate) so
> + * must be rechecked.
> + */
> + free_one_page(zone, page, pfn, order,
> + get_pcppage_migratetype(page), FPI_NONE);
> }
> pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-05 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 11:13 Lecopzer Chen
2023-09-05 9:09 ` Mel Gorman
2023-09-05 9:22 ` Lecopzer Chen [this message]
2023-09-05 9:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-09-05 12:28 ` Mel Gorman
2023-09-11 15:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-09-11 16:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-09-11 18:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-09-11 19:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230905092240.19132-1-lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--to=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe.liu@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yj.chiang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox