linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	fam.zheng@bytedance.com, liangma@liangbit.com,
	punit.agrawal@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [v3 4/4] mm: hugetlb: Skip initialization of gigantic tail struct pages if freed by HVO
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:04:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230828210418.GD3290@monkey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <486CFF93-3BB1-44CD-B0A0-A47F560F2CAE@linux.dev>

On 08/28/23 19:33, Muchun Song wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Aug 25, 2023, at 19:18, Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The new boot flow when it comes to initialization of gigantic pages
> > is as follows:
> > - At boot time, for a gigantic page during __alloc_bootmem_hugepage,
> > the region after the first struct page is marked as noinit.
> > - This results in only the first struct page to be
> > initialized in reserve_bootmem_region. As the tail struct pages are
> > not initialized at this point, there can be a significant saving
> > in boot time if HVO succeeds later on.
> > - Later on in the boot, HVO is attempted. If its successful, only the first
> > HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_RESERVE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page) - 1 tail struct pages
> > after the head struct page are initialized. If it is not successful,
> > then all of the tail struct pages are initialized.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>
> 
> This edition is simpler than before ever, thanks for your work.
> 
> There is premise that other subsystems do not access vmemmap pages
> before the initialization of vmemmap pages associated withe HugeTLB
> pages allocated from bootmem for your optimization. However, IIUC, the
> compacting path could access arbitrary struct page when memory fails
> to be allocated via buddy allocator. So we should make sure that
> those struct pages are not referenced in this routine. And I know
> if CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is enabled, it will encounter
> the same issue, but I don't find any code to prevent this from
> happening. I need more time to confirm this, if someone already knows,
> please let me know, thanks. So I think HugeTLB should adopt the similar
> way to prevent this.

In this patch, the call to hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize() is moved BEFORE
__prep_new_hugetlb_folio or prep_new_hugetlb_folio in all code paths.
The prep_new_hugetlb_folio routine(s) are what set the destructor (soon
to be a flag) that identifies the set of pages as a hugetlb page.  So,
there is now a window where a set of pages not identified as hugetlb
will not have vmemmap pages.

Recently, I closed the same window in the hugetlb freeing code paths with
commit 32c877191e02 'hugetlb: do not clear hugetlb dtor until allocating'.
This patch needs to be reworked so that this window is not opened in the
allocation paths.
-- 
Mike Kravetz


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-28 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-25 11:18 [v3 0/4] " Usama Arif
2023-08-25 11:18 ` [v3 1/4] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: Use nid of the head page to reallocate it Usama Arif
2023-08-28  7:15   ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28 18:25     ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-25 11:18 ` [v3 2/4] memblock: pass memblock_type to memblock_setclr_flag Usama Arif
2023-08-28  7:16   ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28  7:37   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-08-28 18:39   ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-25 11:18 ` [v3 3/4] memblock: introduce MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT_VMEMMAP flag Usama Arif
2023-08-28  7:26   ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28  7:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-08-28  8:52     ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28  9:09       ` Mike Rapoport
2023-08-28  9:18         ` Muchun Song
2023-08-25 11:18 ` [v3 4/4] mm: hugetlb: Skip initialization of gigantic tail struct pages if freed by HVO Usama Arif
2023-08-28 11:33   ` Muchun Song
2023-08-28 21:04     ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2023-08-29  3:33       ` Muchun Song
2023-08-29  3:47         ` Mike Kravetz
2023-08-30 10:27     ` [External] " Usama Arif
2023-08-31  6:21       ` [External] " Muchun Song
2023-08-31  9:58         ` Mel Gorman
2023-08-31 10:01           ` Muchun Song
2023-08-31 10:28             ` Mel Gorman
2023-08-31  7:33       ` [External] " Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230828210418.GD3290@monkey \
    --to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
    --cc=liangma@liangbit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox