From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: remove unintentional voluntary preemption in get_mmap_lock_carefully
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 12:43:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230820104303.2083444-1-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)
Should the trylock succeed (and thus blocking was avoided), the routine
wants to ensure blocking was still legal to do. However, the method
used ends up calling __cond_resched injecting a voluntary preemption
point with the freshly acquired lock.
One can hack around it using __might_sleep instead of mere might_sleep,
but since threads keep going off CPU here, I figured it is better to
accomodate it.
Drop the trylock, do the read lock which does the job prior to lock
acquire.
Found by checking off-CPU time during kernel build (like so:
"offcputime-bpfcc -Ku"), sample backtrace:
finish_task_switch.isra.0
__schedule
__cond_resched
lock_mm_and_find_vma
do_user_addr_fault
exc_page_fault
asm_exc_page_fault
- sh (4502)
10
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 1ec1ef3418bf..f31d5243272b 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -5257,12 +5257,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_mm_fault);
static inline bool get_mmap_lock_carefully(struct mm_struct *mm, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- /* Even if this succeeds, make it clear we *might* have slept */
- if (likely(mmap_read_trylock(mm))) {
- might_sleep();
- return true;
- }
-
if (regs && !user_mode(regs)) {
unsigned long ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
if (!search_exception_tables(ip))
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-20 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-20 10:43 Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2023-08-20 11:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-20 12:41 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-20 12:46 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-20 12:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-20 12:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-20 13:08 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-20 13:00 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-20 18:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-21 1:13 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-21 3:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-21 4:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-21 5:38 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230820104303.2083444-1-mjguzik@gmail.com \
--to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox