linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: remove unintentional voluntary preemption in get_mmap_lock_carefully
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 12:43:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230820104303.2083444-1-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)

Should the trylock succeed (and thus blocking was avoided), the routine
wants to ensure blocking was still legal to do. However, the method
used ends up calling __cond_resched injecting a voluntary preemption
point with the freshly acquired lock.

One can hack around it using __might_sleep instead of mere might_sleep,
but since threads keep going off CPU here, I figured it is better to
accomodate it.

Drop the trylock, do the read lock which does the job prior to lock
acquire.

Found by checking off-CPU time during kernel build (like so:
"offcputime-bpfcc -Ku"), sample backtrace:
    finish_task_switch.isra.0
    __schedule
    __cond_resched
    lock_mm_and_find_vma
    do_user_addr_fault
    exc_page_fault
    asm_exc_page_fault
    -                sh (4502)
        10

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 1ec1ef3418bf..f31d5243272b 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -5257,12 +5257,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_mm_fault);
 
 static inline bool get_mmap_lock_carefully(struct mm_struct *mm, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	/* Even if this succeeds, make it clear we *might* have slept */
-	if (likely(mmap_read_trylock(mm))) {
-		might_sleep();
-		return true;
-	}
-
 	if (regs && !user_mode(regs)) {
 		unsigned long ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
 		if (!search_exception_tables(ip))
-- 
2.39.2



             reply	other threads:[~2023-08-20 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-20 10:43 Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2023-08-20 11:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-20 12:41   ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-20 12:46     ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-20 12:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-20 12:59       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-20 13:08         ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-20 13:00       ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-20 18:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-21  1:13   ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-21  3:58     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-21  4:55       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-21  5:38         ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230820104303.2083444-1-mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox