From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@fromorbit.com, tkhai@ya.ru,
vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, djwong@kernel.org,
brauner@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
steven.price@arm.com, cel@kernel.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
yujie.liu@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
muchun.song@linux.dev, joel@joelfernandes.org,
christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: shrinker: remove redundant shrinker_rwsem in debugfs operations
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 19:24:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230817112402.77010-4-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230817112402.77010-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
The debugfs_remove_recursive() will wait for debugfs_file_put() to return,
so the shrinker will not be freed when doing debugfs operations (such as
shrinker_debugfs_count_show() and shrinker_debugfs_scan_write()), so there
is no need to hold shrinker_rwsem during debugfs operations.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
mm/shrinker_debug.c | 16 +---------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/shrinker_debug.c b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
index ee0cddb4530f..e4ce509f619e 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker_debug.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
@@ -51,17 +51,12 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
unsigned long total;
bool memcg_aware;
- int ret, nid;
+ int ret = 0, nid;
count_per_node = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!count_per_node)
return -ENOMEM;
- ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem);
- if (ret) {
- kfree(count_per_node);
- return ret;
- }
rcu_read_lock();
memcg_aware = shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
@@ -94,7 +89,6 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
rcu_read_unlock();
- up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
kfree(count_per_node);
return ret;
@@ -119,7 +113,6 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
int nid;
char kbuf[72];
- ssize_t ret;
read_len = size < (sizeof(kbuf) - 1) ? size : (sizeof(kbuf) - 1);
if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len))
@@ -148,12 +141,6 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file,
return -EINVAL;
}
- ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem);
- if (ret) {
- mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
- return ret;
- }
-
sc.nid = nid;
sc.memcg = memcg;
sc.nr_to_scan = nr_to_scan;
@@ -161,7 +148,6 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file,
shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, &sc);
- up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
return size;
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-17 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-17 11:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink (part 1) Qi Zheng
2023-08-17 11:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: move some shrinker-related function declarations to mm/internal.h Qi Zheng
2023-08-17 11:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm: vmscan: move shrinker-related code into a separate file Qi Zheng
2023-08-17 11:24 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2023-08-17 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/ttm: introduce pool_shrink_rwsem Qi Zheng
2023-08-17 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm: shrinker: add a secondary array for shrinker_info::{map, nr_deferred} Qi Zheng
2023-08-22 7:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink (part 1) Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230817112402.77010-4-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox