linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <willy@infradead.org>,
	<vishal.moola@gmail.com>, <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	<minchan@kernel.org>, <yuzhao@google.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
	<ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] don't use mapcount() to check large folio sharing
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:43:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807094342.17199a897f51a298f20fda57@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6dbf9f37-e4bf-656d-4121-789e2e6cfae2@intel.com>

On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:14:53 +0800 "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On 8/2/2023 8:39 PM, Yin, Fengwei wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > On 7/29/2023 1:24 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 00:13:54 +0800 Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> In madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() and madvise_free_pte_range(),
> >>> folio_mapcount() is used to check whether the folio is shared. But it's
> >>> not correct as folio_mapcount() returns total mapcount of large folio.
> >>>
> >>> Use folio_estimated_sharers() here as the estimated number is enough.
> >>
> >> What are the user-visible runtime effects of these changes?
> >>
> >> (and please try to avoid using the same Subject: for different patches)
> >>
> > 
> > Can you hold on these patches to mm-unstable? I think we need to wait for
> > David's work on folio_maybe_mapped_shared() and redo the fix base on that.
> > Thanks and sorry for the noise.
> Sorry for bothering you again for this patchset.
> 
> Let me explain the situation here:
>   - The reason to hold on the patches to mm-unstable is that I don't want to
>     promote the fix in this patch (using folio_estimated_sharers()). The
>     correct way is waiting for folio_maybe_mapped_shared() from David.
> 
>     Merging these patches motivate using folio_estimated_sharers() in other
>     places. So once folio_maybe_mapped_shared() is ready, we need to replace
>     folio_estimated_sharers() with folio_maybe_mapped_shared().
> 
>   - For this specific patches, if they are suitable for stable, we may want to
>     merge it (special for stable branch. I assume folio_maybe_mapped_shared()
>     may not be back ported to stable branch).
> 
> So how do we deal with this situation? Thanks in advance.
> 

I think I'll stage them for 6.5, with a cc:stable.

I'll drop the current three patches.  Please resend with

a) different Subject:s for all patches and

b) changelogs which fully describe the user-visible effects of the change.

Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-07 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-28 16:13 Yin Fengwei
2023-07-28 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] madvise: don't use mapcount() against large folio for sharing check Yin Fengwei
2023-07-28 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Yin Fengwei
2023-07-28 17:41   ` Andrew Morton
2023-07-29 13:53     ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-28 17:24 ` [PATCH 0/2] don't use mapcount() to check large folio sharing Andrew Morton
2023-08-02 12:39   ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-04  7:14     ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-07 16:43       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-08-08  0:02         ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-02 10:27 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-02 10:48   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-02 11:20     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-02 11:36       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-02 11:51         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-02 11:52           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-02 12:35   ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-02 12:40     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-02 12:42       ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-02 12:49         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-02 12:55           ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-03 20:46             ` Yu Zhao
2023-08-03 23:27               ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-03 23:38                 ` Yu Zhao
2023-08-04  0:17                   ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-04  7:31                     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-04  7:36                       ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-04  8:11                       ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-08-02 12:43       ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230807094342.17199a897f51a298f20fda57@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox