From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 7/7] mm/hotplug: Enable runtime update of memmap_on_memory parameter
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:32:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230725100212.531277-8-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230725100212.531277-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
---
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 96e794f39313..6cb6eac1aee5 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -95,7 +95,12 @@ static int set_memmap_mode(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
mode = MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_DISABLE;
matched:
+ /*
+ * Avoid changing memmap mode during hotplug.
+ */
+ get_online_mems();
*((int *)kp->arg) = mode;
+ put_online_mems();
if (mode == MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_FORCE) {
unsigned long memmap_pages = memory_block_memmap_on_memory_pages();
@@ -116,7 +121,7 @@ static const struct kernel_param_ops memmap_mode_ops = {
.set = set_memmap_mode,
.get = get_memmap_mode,
};
-module_param_cb(memmap_on_memory, &memmap_mode_ops, &memmap_mode, 0444);
+module_param_cb(memmap_on_memory, &memmap_mode_ops, &memmap_mode, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(memmap_on_memory, "Enable memmap on memory for memory hotplug\n"
"With value \"force\" it could result in memory wastage due "
"to memmap size limitations (Y/N/force)");
@@ -2175,18 +2180,16 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
* We only support removing memory added with MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY in
* the same granularity it was added - a single memory block.
*/
- if (mhp_memmap_on_memory()) {
- ret = walk_memory_blocks(start, size, &mhp_altmap,
- get_vmemmap_altmap_cb);
- if (ret) {
- if (size != memory_block_size_bytes()) {
- pr_warn("Refuse to remove %#llx - %#llx,"
- "wrong granularity\n",
- start, start + size);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- altmap = &mhp_altmap;
+ ret = walk_memory_blocks(start, size, &mhp_altmap,
+ get_vmemmap_altmap_cb);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (size != memory_block_size_bytes()) {
+ pr_warn("Refuse to remove %#llx - %#llx,"
+ "wrong granularity\n",
+ start, start + size);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
+ altmap = &mhp_altmap;
}
/* remove memmap entry */
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-25 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 10:02 [PATCH v5 0/7] Add support for memmap on memory feature on ppc64 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] mm/hotplug: Simplify ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE kconfig Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] mm/hotplug: Allow memmap on memory hotplug request to fallback Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] mm/hotplug: Allow architecture to override memmap on memory support check Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] mm/hotplug: Support memmap_on_memory when memmap is not aligned to pageblocks Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 18:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-26 4:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-26 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand
[not found] ` <9d1448d3-a43a-5305-68aa-d82111fe077a@linux.ibm.com>
2023-07-26 16:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] powerpc/book3s64/memhotplug: Enable memmap on memory for radix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-25 10:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] mm/hotplug: Embed vmem_altmap details in memory block Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-26 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-26 10:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-26 16:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 10:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2023-07-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] mm/hotplug: Enable runtime update of memmap_on_memory parameter David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 10:06 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] Add support for memmap on memory feature on ppc64 David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230725100212.531277-8-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox