linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: ajd@linux.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	fbarrat@linux.ibm.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev, jgg@ziepe.ca,
	jhubbard@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, npiggin@gmail.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	seanjc@google.com, will@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmu_notifiers: Call arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs() when invalidating TLBs
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:17:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230718111759.5642b4c4ffd72ddd9c8aa29f@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <791a6c1c4a79de6f99bffc594b53a39a6234e87f.1689666760.git-series.apopple@nvidia.com>

On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 17:56:17 +1000 Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> wrote:

> The arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs() is an architecture specific mmu
> notifier used to keep the TLB of secondary MMUs such as an IOMMU in
> sync with the CPU page tables. Currently it is called from separate
> code paths to the main CPU TLB invalidations. This can lead to a
> secondary TLB not getting invalidated when required and makes it hard
> to reason about when exactly the secondary TLB is invalidated.
> 
> To fix this move the notifier call to the architecture specific TLB
> maintenance functions for architectures that have secondary MMUs
> requiring explicit software invalidations.
> 
> This fixes a SMMU bug on ARM64. On ARM64 PTE permission upgrades
> require a TLB invalidation. This invalidation is done by the
> architecutre specific ptep_set_access_flags() which calls
> flush_tlb_page() if required. However this doesn't call the notifier
> resulting in infinite faults being generated by devices using the SMMU
> if it has previously cached a read-only PTE in it's TLB.

This sounds like a pretty serious bug.  Can it happen in current
released kernels?  If so, is a -stable backport needed?

> Moving the invalidations into the TLB invalidation functions ensures
> all invalidations happen at the same time as the CPU invalidation. The
> architecture specific flush_tlb_all() routines do not call the
> notifier as none of the IOMMUs require this.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-18 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18  7:56 [PATCH 0/4] Invalidate secondary IOMMU TLB on permission upgrade Alistair Popple
2023-07-18  7:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm_notifiers: Rename invalidate_range notifier Alistair Popple
2023-07-18 17:57   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-18 18:36     ` Andrew Morton
2023-07-18 23:49       ` Alistair Popple
2023-07-18  7:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64/smmu: Use TLBI ASID when invalidating entire range Alistair Popple
2023-07-18  7:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] mmu_notifiers: Call arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs() when invalidating TLBs Alistair Popple
2023-07-18 18:17   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-07-18 18:29     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-18  7:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] mmu_notifiers: Don't invalidate secondary TLBs as part of mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() Alistair Popple
2023-07-19  3:04 ` [PATCH 0/4] Invalidate secondary IOMMU TLB on permission upgrade Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-19  3:14   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-19  5:42     ` Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230718111759.5642b4c4ffd72ddd9c8aa29f@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fbarrat@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox