* Re: [PATCH] mm/percpu.c: change GFP_KERNEL to GFP_ATOMIC [not found] ` <7aa3a1cee63518cb13906d11ea130c9c@208suo.com> @ 2023-07-18 17:17 ` Andrew Morton 2023-07-20 23:43 ` Baoquan He 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-07-18 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sunran001; +Cc: dennis, tj, cl, linux-mm, linux-kernel On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 14:35:11 +0800 sunran001@208suo.com wrote: > ERROR: function pcpu_balance_populated called on line 2238 inside lock > on line 2234 but uses GFP_KERNEL > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/locks/call_kern.cocci > > ... > > --- a/mm/percpu.c > +++ b/mm/percpu.c > @@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ static void pcpu_balance_free(bool empty_only) > static void pcpu_balance_populated(void) > { > /* gfp flags passed to underlying allocators */ > - const gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN; > + const gfp_t gfp = GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN; > struct pcpu_chunk *chunk; > int slot, nr_to_pop, ret; I don't believe this warning is correct. spin_unlock_irq(&pcpu_lock); ret = pcpu_populate_chunk(chunk, rs, rs + nr, gfp); cond_resched(); spin_lock_irq(&pcpu_lock); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/percpu.c: change GFP_KERNEL to GFP_ATOMIC 2023-07-18 17:17 ` [PATCH] mm/percpu.c: change GFP_KERNEL to GFP_ATOMIC Andrew Morton @ 2023-07-20 23:43 ` Baoquan He 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Baoquan He @ 2023-07-20 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: sunran001, dennis, tj, cl, linux-mm, linux-kernel On 07/18/23 at 10:17am, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 14:35:11 +0800 sunran001@208suo.com wrote: > > > ERROR: function pcpu_balance_populated called on line 2238 inside lock > > on line 2234 but uses GFP_KERNEL > > > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/locks/call_kern.cocci > > > > ... > > > > --- a/mm/percpu.c > > +++ b/mm/percpu.c > > @@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ static void pcpu_balance_free(bool empty_only) > > static void pcpu_balance_populated(void) > > { > > /* gfp flags passed to underlying allocators */ > > - const gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN; > > + const gfp_t gfp = GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN; > > struct pcpu_chunk *chunk; > > int slot, nr_to_pop, ret; > > I don't believe this warning is correct. Yeah, the warning is false positive. It releases the lock when requesting memory allocation, then take the lock again. > > spin_unlock_irq(&pcpu_lock); > ret = pcpu_populate_chunk(chunk, rs, rs + nr, gfp); > cond_resched(); > spin_lock_irq(&pcpu_lock); > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-20 23:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20230718063328.16140-1-xujianghui@cdjrlc.com>
[not found] ` <7aa3a1cee63518cb13906d11ea130c9c@208suo.com>
2023-07-18 17:17 ` [PATCH] mm/percpu.c: change GFP_KERNEL to GFP_ATOMIC Andrew Morton
2023-07-20 23:43 ` Baoquan He
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox