From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Yu Ma <yu.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lipeng.zhu@intel.com, pan.deng@intel.com, shakeelb@google.com,
tianyou.li@intel.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/mmap: move vma operations to mm_struct out of the critical section of file mapping lock
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:28:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230711112824.e559065488b08ce649cccfd7@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230711172020.562250-1-yu.ma@intel.com>
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 13:20:20 -0400 Yu Ma <yu.ma@intel.com> wrote:
> UnixBench/Execl represents a class of workload where bash scripts are
> spawned frequently to do some short jobs. When running multiple parallel
> tasks, hot osq_lock is observed from do_mmap and exit_mmap. Both of them
> come from load_elf_binary through the call chain
> "execl->do_execveat_common->bprm_execve->load_elf_binary". In do_mmap,it will
> call mmap_region to create vma node, initialize it and insert it to vma
> maintain structure in mm_struct and i_mmap tree of the mapping file, then
> increase map_count to record the number of vma nodes used. The hot osq_lock
> is to protect operations on file’s i_mmap tree. For the mm_struct member
> change like vma insertion and map_count update, they do not affect i_mmap
> tree. Move those operations out of the lock's critical section, to reduce
> hold time on the lock.
>
> With this change, on Intel Sapphire Rapids 112C/224T platform, based on
> v6.0-rc6, the 160 parallel score improves by 12%. The patch has no
> obvious performance gain on v6.4-rc4 due to regression of this benchmark
> from this commit f1a7941243c102a44e8847e3b94ff4ff3ec56f25 (mm: convert
> mm's rss stats into percpu_counter). Related discussion and conclusion
> can be referred at the mail thread initiated by 0day as below:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/a4aa2e13-7187-600b-c628-7e8fb108def0@intel.com/
Could you please redo/retest this against a kernel which has
1c7873e3364 ("mm: lock newly mapped VMA with corrected ordering")?
mainline, mm-unstable or linux-next.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230606124939.93561-1-yu.ma@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20230606192013.viiifjcgb6enyilx@revolver>
2023-06-06 19:54 ` [PATCH] " Liam R. Howlett
2023-06-07 13:09 ` Ma, Yu
2023-06-21 14:20 ` Ma, Yu
2023-07-05 16:54 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-07-05 17:33 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-07-05 19:06 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-07-06 15:15 ` [PATCH] mm/mmap: move vmKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>a " Ma, Yu
2023-07-11 17:20 ` [PATCH v2] mm/mmap: move vma " Yu Ma
2023-07-11 18:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-07-12 0:15 ` Ma, Yu
2023-07-12 14:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Yu Ma
2023-07-06 22:04 ` [PATCH] " Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-07-07 4:40 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230711112824.e559065488b08ce649cccfd7@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lipeng.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=pan.deng@intel.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tianyou.li@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yu.ma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox