linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	 josef@toxicpanda.com, jack@suse.cz, ldufour@linux.ibm.com,
	 laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com, michel@lespinasse.org,
	liam.howlett@oracle.com,  jglisse@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	minchan@google.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
	 punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, lstoakes@gmail.com,
	hdanton@sina.com,  apopple@nvidia.com, peterx@redhat.com,
	ying.huang@intel.com, david@redhat.com,  yuzhao@google.com,
	dhowells@redhat.com, hughd@google.com,  viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	brauner@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
	 surenb@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 4/6] mm: change folio_lock_or_retry to use vm_fault directly
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 14:19:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230630211957.1341547-5-surenb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230630211957.1341547-1-surenb@google.com>

Change folio_lock_or_retry to accept vm_fault struct and return the
vm_fault_t directly.

Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/pagemap.h | 11 ++++++-----
 mm/filemap.c            | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 mm/memory.c             | 14 ++++++--------
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 716953ee1ebd..de16f740b755 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -900,8 +900,7 @@ static inline bool wake_page_match(struct wait_page_queue *wait_page,
 
 void __folio_lock(struct folio *folio);
 int __folio_lock_killable(struct folio *folio);
-bool __folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio, struct mm_struct *mm,
-				unsigned int flags);
+vm_fault_t __folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio, struct vm_fault *vmf);
 void unlock_page(struct page *page);
 void folio_unlock(struct folio *folio);
 
@@ -1005,11 +1004,13 @@ static inline int folio_lock_killable(struct folio *folio)
  * Return value and mmap_lock implications depend on flags; see
  * __folio_lock_or_retry().
  */
-static inline bool folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio,
-		struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int flags)
+static inline vm_fault_t folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio,
+					     struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
 	might_sleep();
-	return folio_trylock(folio) || __folio_lock_or_retry(folio, mm, flags);
+	if (!folio_trylock(folio))
+		return __folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vmf);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 9e44a49bbd74..5da5ad6f7f4c 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1669,32 +1669,34 @@ static int __folio_lock_async(struct folio *folio, struct wait_page_queue *wait)
 
 /*
  * Return values:
- * true - folio is locked; mmap_lock is still held.
- * false - folio is not locked.
+ * 0 - folio is locked.
+ * non-zero - folio is not locked.
  *     mmap_lock has been released (mmap_read_unlock(), unless flags had both
  *     FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY and FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT set, in
  *     which case mmap_lock is still held.
  *
- * If neither ALLOW_RETRY nor KILLABLE are set, will always return true
+ * If neither ALLOW_RETRY nor KILLABLE are set, will always return 0
  * with the folio locked and the mmap_lock unperturbed.
  */
-bool __folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio, struct mm_struct *mm,
-			 unsigned int flags)
+vm_fault_t __folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio, struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
+	struct mm_struct *mm = vmf->vma->vm_mm;
+	unsigned int flags = vmf->flags;
+
 	if (fault_flag_allow_retry_first(flags)) {
 		/*
 		 * CAUTION! In this case, mmap_lock is not released
-		 * even though return 0.
+		 * even though return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
 		 */
 		if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT)
-			return false;
+			return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 
 		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 		if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE)
 			folio_wait_locked_killable(folio);
 		else
 			folio_wait_locked(folio);
-		return false;
+		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 	}
 	if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE) {
 		bool ret;
@@ -1702,13 +1704,13 @@ bool __folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio, struct mm_struct *mm,
 		ret = __folio_lock_killable(folio);
 		if (ret) {
 			mmap_read_unlock(mm);
-			return false;
+			return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
 		}
 	} else {
 		__folio_lock(folio);
 	}
 
-	return true;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 5f26c56ce979..4ae3f046f593 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3582,6 +3582,7 @@ static vm_fault_t remove_device_exclusive_entry(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	struct folio *folio = page_folio(vmf->page);
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
 	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
+	vm_fault_t ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * We need a reference to lock the folio because we don't hold
@@ -3594,9 +3595,10 @@ static vm_fault_t remove_device_exclusive_entry(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	if (!folio_try_get(folio))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vma->vm_mm, vmf->flags)) {
+	ret = folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vmf);
+	if (ret) {
 		folio_put(folio);
-		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+		return ret;
 	}
 	mmu_notifier_range_init_owner(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_EXCLUSIVE, 0,
 				vma->vm_mm, vmf->address & PAGE_MASK,
@@ -3721,7 +3723,6 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	bool exclusive = false;
 	swp_entry_t entry;
 	pte_t pte;
-	int locked;
 	vm_fault_t ret = 0;
 	void *shadow = NULL;
 
@@ -3844,12 +3845,9 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 		goto out_release;
 	}
 
-	locked = folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vma->vm_mm, vmf->flags);
-
-	if (!locked) {
-		ret |= VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+	ret |= folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vmf);
+	if (ret & VM_FAULT_RETRY)
 		goto out_release;
-	}
 
 	if (swapcache) {
 		/*
-- 
2.41.0.255.g8b1d071c50-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-30 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-30 21:19 [PATCH v7 0/6] Per-VMA lock support for swap and userfaults Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 21:19 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] swap: remove remnants of polling from read_swap_cache_async Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 21:19 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] mm: add missing VM_FAULT_RESULT_TRACE name for VM_FAULT_COMPLETED Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 21:19 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] mm: drop per-VMA lock when returning VM_FAULT_RETRY or VM_FAULT_COMPLETED Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 21:19 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2023-06-30 21:19 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] mm: handle swap page faults under per-VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 21:19 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] mm: handle userfaults under VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-07-02 17:50 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] Per-VMA lock support for swap and userfaults Andrew Morton
2023-07-03 15:27   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-09  7:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-09 14:28   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-09 15:22     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-09 17:17       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-09 18:04         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-09 18:08           ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-09 18:31             ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-10  5:29               ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-10  6:24                 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-10  7:40                   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 20:20                     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-10 22:00                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-10 22:16                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-10 23:29                     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-10 23:43                       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-08-11  6:13                         ` Suren Baghdasaryan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230630211957.1341547-5-surenb@google.com \
    --to=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jglisse@google.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=michel@lespinasse.org \
    --cc=minchan@google.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox