From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@fromorbit.com, tkhai@ya.ru,
vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, djwong@kernel.org,
brauner@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 25/29] mm: vmscan: make memcg slab shrink lockless
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:53:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230622085335.77010-26-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622085335.77010-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Like global slab shrink, this commit also uses refcount+RCU
method to make memcg slab shrink lockless.
We can reproduce the down_read_trylock() hotspot through the
following script:
```
DIR="/root/shrinker/memcg/mnt"
do_create()
{
mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test
mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event/test
echo 4G > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
for i in `seq 0 $1`;
do
mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/$i;
echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/$i/cgroup.procs;
echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event/test/cgroup.procs;
mkdir -p $DIR/$i;
done
}
do_mount()
{
for i in `seq $1 $2`;
do
mount -t tmpfs $i $DIR/$i;
done
}
do_touch()
{
for i in `seq $1 $2`;
do
echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/$i/cgroup.procs;
echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event/test/cgroup.procs;
dd if=/dev/zero of=$DIR/$i/file$i bs=1M count=1 &
done
}
case "$1" in
touch)
do_touch $2 $3
;;
test)
do_create 4000
do_mount 0 4000
do_touch 0 3000
;;
*)
exit 1
;;
esac
```
Save the above script, then run test and touch commands.
Then we can use the following perf command to view hotspots:
perf top -U -F 999 [-g]
1) Before applying this patchset:
35.34% [kernel] [k] down_read_trylock
18.44% [kernel] [k] shrink_slab
15.98% [kernel] [k] pv_native_safe_halt
15.08% [kernel] [k] up_read
5.33% [kernel] [k] idr_find
2.71% [kernel] [k] _find_next_bit
2.21% [kernel] [k] shrink_node
1.29% [kernel] [k] shrink_lruvec
0.66% [kernel] [k] do_shrink_slab
0.33% [kernel] [k] list_lru_count_one
0.33% [kernel] [k] __radix_tree_lookup
0.25% [kernel] [k] mem_cgroup_iter
- 82.19% 19.49% [kernel] [k] shrink_slab
- 62.00% shrink_slab
36.37% down_read_trylock
15.52% up_read
5.48% idr_find
3.38% _find_next_bit
+ 0.98% do_shrink_slab
2) After applying this patchset:
46.83% [kernel] [k] shrink_slab
20.52% [kernel] [k] pv_native_safe_halt
8.85% [kernel] [k] do_shrink_slab
7.71% [kernel] [k] _find_next_bit
1.72% [kernel] [k] xas_descend
1.70% [kernel] [k] shrink_node
1.44% [kernel] [k] shrink_lruvec
1.43% [kernel] [k] mem_cgroup_iter
1.28% [kernel] [k] xas_load
0.89% [kernel] [k] super_cache_count
0.84% [kernel] [k] xas_start
0.66% [kernel] [k] list_lru_count_one
- 65.50% 40.44% [kernel] [k] shrink_slab
- 22.96% shrink_slab
13.11% _find_next_bit
- 9.91% do_shrink_slab
- 1.59% super_cache_count
0.92% list_lru_count_one
We can see that the first perf hotspot becomes shrink_slab,
which is what we expect.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 767569698946..357a1f2ad690 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -213,6 +213,12 @@ static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
}
+static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_rcu(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ int nid)
+{
+ return rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info);
+}
+
static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int map_size, int defer_size,
int old_map_size, int old_defer_size,
@@ -339,7 +345,7 @@ void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id)
struct shrinker_info *info;
rcu_read_lock();
- info = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info);
+ info = shrinker_info_rcu(memcg, nid);
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(shrinker_id >= info->map_nr_max)) {
/* Pairs with smp mb in shrink_slab() */
smp_mb__before_atomic();
@@ -359,7 +365,6 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
return -ENOSYS;
down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
- /* This may call shrinker, so it must use down_read_trylock() */
id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (id < 0)
goto unlock;
@@ -392,18 +397,28 @@ static long xchg_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
struct shrinker_info *info;
+ long nr_deferred;
- info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
- return atomic_long_xchg(&info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id], 0);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ info = shrinker_info_rcu(memcg, nid);
+ nr_deferred = atomic_long_xchg(&info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id], 0);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return nr_deferred;
}
static long add_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
struct shrinker_info *info;
+ long nr_deferred;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ info = shrinker_info_rcu(memcg, nid);
+ nr_deferred = atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
- return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]);
+ return nr_deferred;
}
void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
@@ -955,19 +970,18 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
{
struct shrinker_info *info;
unsigned long ret, freed = 0;
- int i;
+ int i = 0;
if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
return 0;
- if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
- return 0;
-
- info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
+again:
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ info = shrinker_info_rcu(memcg, nid);
if (unlikely(!info))
goto unlock;
- for_each_set_bit(i, info->map, info->map_nr_max) {
+ for_each_set_bit_from(i, info->map, info->map_nr_max) {
struct shrink_control sc = {
.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
.nid = nid,
@@ -982,6 +996,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
continue;
}
+ if (!shrinker_try_get(shrinker))
+ continue;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
/* Call non-slab shrinkers even though kmem is disabled */
if (!memcg_kmem_online() &&
!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NONSLAB))
@@ -1014,13 +1032,19 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
}
freed += ret;
- if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
- freed = freed ? : 1;
- break;
- }
+ shrinker_put(shrinker);
+
+ /*
+ * We have already exited the read-side of rcu critical section
+ * before calling do_shrink_slab(), the shrinker_info may be
+ * released in expand_one_shrinker_info(), so restart the
+ * iteration.
+ */
+ i++;
+ goto again;
}
unlock:
- up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return freed;
}
#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-22 8:53 [PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 01/29] mm: shrinker: add shrinker::private_data field Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 14:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-06-23 12:50 ` [External] " Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 02/29] mm: vmscan: introduce some helpers for dynamically allocating shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-23 6:12 ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-23 12:49 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 03/29] drm/i915: dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 04/29] drm/msm: dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 05/29] drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-23 13:33 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-23 14:18 ` Bobs_Email
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 06/29] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 07/29] dm zoned: dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 08/29] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 09/29] bcache: dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 10/29] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 11/29] virtio_balloon: dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 12/29] mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 13/29] ext4: dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 14/29] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 15/29] NFSD: dynamically allocate the nfsd-client shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-23 21:49 ` Chuck Lever
2023-06-24 11:17 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 16/29] NFSD: dynamically allocate the nfsd-reply shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 17/29] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-buf shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 18/29] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-inodegc shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 19/29] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-qm shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 20/29] zsmalloc: dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 21/29] fs: super: dynamically allocate the s_shrink Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 22/29] drm/ttm: introduce pool_shrink_rwsem Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 23/29] mm: shrinker: add refcount and completion_wait fields Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 24/29] mm: vmscan: make global slab shrink lockless Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 15:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-06-22 16:42 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 17:41 ` Alan Huang
2023-06-22 18:18 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-23 6:29 ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-23 13:10 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-23 22:19 ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-24 11:08 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-25 3:15 ` Qi Zheng
2023-07-04 4:20 ` Qi Zheng
2023-07-03 16:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-07-04 3:45 ` Qi Zheng
2023-07-05 3:27 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 26/29] mm: shrinker: make count and scan in shrinker debugfs lockless Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 27/29] mm: vmscan: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 28/29] mm: shrinkers: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 8:53 ` [PATCH 29/29] mm: shrinker: move shrinker-related code into a separate file Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 14:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-06-23 13:12 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-23 5:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-06-23 13:24 ` Qi Zheng
2023-06-22 9:02 ` [PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230622085335.77010-26-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox