linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <david@redhat.com>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<mawupeng1@huawei.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH stable 5.10] mm/memory_hotplug: extend offline_and_remove_memory() to handle more than one memory block
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 14:51:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230619065121.1720912-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd9688dc-a716-3031-489e-a867df0d1ea2@huawei.com>

From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

commit 8dc4bb58a146655eb057247d7c9d19e73928715b upstream.

virtio-mem soon wants to use offline_and_remove_memory() memory that
exceeds a single Linux memory block (memory_block_size_bytes()). Let's
remove that restriction.

Let's remember the old state and try to restore that if anything goes
wrong. While re-onlining can, in general, fail, it's highly unlikely to
happen (usually only when a notifier fails to allocate memory, and these
are rather rare).

This will be used by virtio-mem to offline+remove memory ranges that are
bigger than a single memory block - for example, with a device block
size of 1 GiB (e.g., gigantic pages in the hypervisor) and a Linux memory
block size of 128MB.

While we could compress the state into 2 bit, using 8 bit is much
easier.

This handling is similar, but different to acpi_scan_try_to_offline():

a) We don't try to offline twice. I am not sure if this CONFIG_MEMCG
optimization is still relevant - it should only apply to ZONE_NORMAL
(where we have no guarantees). If relevant, we can always add it.

b) acpi_scan_try_to_offline() simply onlines all memory in case
something goes wrong. It doesn't restore previous online type. Let's do
that, so we won't overwrite what e.g., user space configured.

Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201112133815.13332-28-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
---
 mm/memory_hotplug.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index f0633f9a9116..9ec9e1e67705 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1788,39 +1788,112 @@ int remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(remove_memory);
 
+static int try_offline_memory_block(struct memory_block *mem, void *arg)
+{
+	uint8_t online_type = MMOP_ONLINE_KERNEL;
+	uint8_t **online_types = arg;
+	struct page *page;
+	int rc;
+
+	/*
+	 * Sense the online_type via the zone of the memory block. Offlining
+	 * with multiple zones within one memory block will be rejected
+	 * by offlining code ... so we don't care about that.
+	 */
+	page = pfn_to_online_page(section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr));
+	if (page && zone_idx(page_zone(page)) == ZONE_MOVABLE)
+		online_type = MMOP_ONLINE_MOVABLE;
+
+	rc = device_offline(&mem->dev);
+	/*
+	 * Default is MMOP_OFFLINE - change it only if offlining succeeded,
+	 * so try_reonline_memory_block() can do the right thing.
+	 */
+	if (!rc)
+		**online_types = online_type;
+
+	(*online_types)++;
+	/* Ignore if already offline. */
+	return rc < 0 ? rc : 0;
+}
+
+static int try_reonline_memory_block(struct memory_block *mem, void *arg)
+{
+	uint8_t **online_types = arg;
+	int rc;
+
+	if (**online_types != MMOP_OFFLINE) {
+		mem->online_type = **online_types;
+		rc = device_online(&mem->dev);
+		if (rc < 0)
+			pr_warn("%s: Failed to re-online memory: %d",
+				__func__, rc);
+	}
+
+	/* Continue processing all remaining memory blocks. */
+	(*online_types)++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
- * Try to offline and remove a memory block. Might take a long time to
- * finish in case memory is still in use. Primarily useful for memory devices
- * that logically unplugged all memory (so it's no longer in use) and want to
- * offline + remove the memory block.
+ * Try to offline and remove memory. Might take a long time to finish in case
+ * memory is still in use. Primarily useful for memory devices that logically
+ * unplugged all memory (so it's no longer in use) and want to offline + remove
+ * that memory.
  */
 int offline_and_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 {
-	struct memory_block *mem;
-	int rc = -EINVAL;
+	const unsigned long mb_count = size / memory_block_size_bytes();
+	uint8_t *online_types, *tmp;
+	int rc;
 
 	if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, memory_block_size_bytes()) ||
-	    size != memory_block_size_bytes())
-		return rc;
+	    !IS_ALIGNED(size, memory_block_size_bytes()) || !size)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * We'll remember the old online type of each memory block, so we can
+	 * try to revert whatever we did when offlining one memory block fails
+	 * after offlining some others succeeded.
+	 */
+	online_types = kmalloc_array(mb_count, sizeof(*online_types),
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!online_types)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	/*
+	 * Initialize all states to MMOP_OFFLINE, so when we abort processing in
+	 * try_offline_memory_block(), we'll skip all unprocessed blocks in
+	 * try_reonline_memory_block().
+	 */
+	memset(online_types, MMOP_OFFLINE, mb_count);
 
 	lock_device_hotplug();
-	mem = find_memory_block(__pfn_to_section(PFN_DOWN(start)));
-	if (mem)
-		rc = device_offline(&mem->dev);
-	/* Ignore if the device is already offline. */
-	if (rc > 0)
-		rc = 0;
+
+	tmp = online_types;
+	rc = walk_memory_blocks(start, size, &tmp, try_offline_memory_block);
 
 	/*
-	 * In case we succeeded to offline the memory block, remove it.
+	 * In case we succeeded to offline all memory, remove it.
 	 * This cannot fail as it cannot get onlined in the meantime.
 	 */
 	if (!rc) {
 		rc = try_remove_memory(nid, start, size);
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(rc);
+		if (rc)
+			pr_err("%s: Failed to remove memory: %d", __func__, rc);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Rollback what we did. While memory onlining might theoretically fail
+	 * (nacked by a notifier), it barely ever happens.
+	 */
+	if (rc) {
+		tmp = online_types;
+		walk_memory_blocks(start, size, &tmp,
+				   try_reonline_memory_block);
 	}
 	unlock_device_hotplug();
 
+	kfree(online_types);
 	return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(offline_and_remove_memory);
-- 
2.25.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-19  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-14  6:18 [PATCH stable 5.10 0/1] Fix memleak during hotremove memory Wupeng Ma
2023-06-14  6:19 ` [PATCH stable 5.10 1/1] mm/memory_hotplug: extend offline_and_remove_memory() to handle more than one memory block Wupeng Ma
2023-06-14  6:35   ` Greg KH
2023-06-14  6:45     ` mawupeng
2023-06-19  6:20       ` Greg KH
2023-06-19  6:54         ` mawupeng
2023-06-19  6:51       ` Wupeng Ma [this message]
2023-06-19  7:16         ` [PATCH stable 5.10] " Greg KH
2023-06-19  7:22           ` mawupeng
2023-06-19  7:41             ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-19  7:53               ` mawupeng
2023-06-19  8:04                 ` Greg KH
2023-06-19  7:48             ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230619065121.1720912-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com \
    --to=mawupeng1@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox