linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	 "Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)" <heftig@archlinux.org>,
	Steven Barrett <steven@liquorix.net>,
	 Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
	"T.J. Alumbaugh" <talumbau@google.com>,
	 Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	 "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	 Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/mlock: WARN_ON() if mapcount overflows into mlock_count
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 06:58:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230618065809.1364900-1-yosryahmed@google.com> (raw)

Add a hook when a new mapping is added to an order-0 mlocked folio to
check if the mapcount overflowed beyond the allocated 20 bits into the
mlock_count. This is useful to know if this alarm if this happens
frequently enough to cause a problem.

We do so by checking if the folio has the lower 20 bits as all 0s. For
file-backed folios, we do not hold the folio lock while adding a new
mapping, so there's a chance that two mappings are added in quick
succession such that the warning doesn't fire. Don't sweat it.

Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |  4 ++++
 mm/mlock.c         | 13 +++++++++++++
 mm/rmap.c          |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index b341477a83e8..917f81996e22 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1050,6 +1050,7 @@ unsigned long vmalloc_to_pfn(const void *addr);
 extern bool is_vmalloc_addr(const void *x);
 extern int is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(const void *x);
 extern int folio_mlocked_mapcount(struct folio *folio);
+extern void folio_mlock_map_check(struct folio *folio);
 extern void folio_mlock_unmap_check(struct folio *folio);
 #else
 static inline bool is_vmalloc_addr(const void *x)
@@ -1064,6 +1065,9 @@ static inline int folio_mlocked_mapcount(struct folio *folio)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+static inline void folio_mlock_map_check(struct folio *folio)
+{
+}
 static inline void folio_mlock_unmap_check(struct folio *folio)
 {
 }
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index 8261df11d6a6..f8b3fb1b2986 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -140,6 +140,19 @@ static int folio_mlock_count_dec(struct folio *folio)
 	return mlock_count - 1;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Call after incrementing the mapcount. WARN_ON() if the mapcount overflows
+ * beyond the lower 20 bits for order-0 mlocked folios.
+ */
+void folio_mlock_map_check(struct folio *folio)
+{
+	int mapcount = atomic_read(&folio->_mapcount) + 1;
+
+	/* WARN if we overflow beyond the lower 20 bits */
+	if (unlikely(!folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_mlocked(folio)))
+		WARN_ON((mapcount & MLOCK_MAPCOUNT_MASK) == 0);
+}
+
 /*
  * Call after decrementing the mapcount. If the mapcount previously overflowed
  * beyond the lower 20 bits for an order-0 mlocked folio, munlock() have
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 02e558551f15..092529319782 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1228,6 +1228,7 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			nr = atomic_inc_return_relaxed(mapped);
 			nr = (nr < COMPOUND_MAPPED);
 		}
+		folio_mlock_map_check(folio);
 	} else if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
 		/* That test is redundant: it's for safety or to optimize out */
 
@@ -1330,6 +1331,7 @@ void page_add_file_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			nr = atomic_inc_return_relaxed(mapped);
 			nr = (nr < COMPOUND_MAPPED);
 		}
+		folio_mlock_map_check(folio);
 	} else if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
 		/* That test is redundant: it's for safety or to optimize out */
 
-- 
2.41.0.162.gfafddb0af9-goog



                 reply	other threads:[~2023-06-18  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230618065809.1364900-1-yosryahmed@google.com \
    --to=yosryahmed@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bgeffon@google.com \
    --cc=cuigaosheng1@huawei.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=heftig@archlinux.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=steven@liquorix.net \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=talumbau@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox