From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, tkhai@ya.ru, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
vbabka@suse.cz, muchun.song@linux.dev, yujie.liu@intel.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: make memcg slab shrink lockless"
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 08:15:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230609081518.3039120-7-qi.zheng@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230609081518.3039120-1-qi.zheng@linux.dev>
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
This reverts commit caa05325c9126c77ebf114edce51536a0d0a9a08.
Kernel test robot reports -88.8% regression in stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec
test case [1], which is caused by commit f95bdb700bc6 ("mm: vmscan: make
global slab shrink lockless"). The root cause is that SRCU has to be careful
to not frequently check for SRCU read-side critical section exits. Therefore,
even if no one is currently in the SRCU read-side critical section,
synchronize_srcu() cannot return quickly. That's why unregister_shrinker()
has become slower.
After discussion, we will try to use the refcount+RCU method [2] proposed
by Dave Chinner to continue to re-implement the lockless slab shrink. So
revert the shrinker_srcu related changes first.
[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZIJhou1d55d4H1s0@dread.disaster.area/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 50775b73d0c7..a008d7f2d0fc 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -210,21 +210,8 @@ static inline int shrinker_defer_size(int nr_items)
static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int nid)
{
- return srcu_dereference_check(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
- &shrinker_srcu,
- lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
-}
-
-static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_srcu(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- int nid)
-{
- return srcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
- &shrinker_srcu);
-}
-
-static void free_shrinker_info_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
-{
- kvfree(container_of(head, struct shrinker_info, rcu));
+ return rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
+ lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
}
static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
@@ -265,7 +252,7 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
defer_size - old_defer_size);
rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, new);
- call_srcu(&shrinker_srcu, &old->rcu, free_shrinker_info_rcu);
+ kvfree_rcu(old, rcu);
}
return 0;
@@ -351,16 +338,15 @@ void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id)
{
if (shrinker_id >= 0 && memcg && !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) {
struct shrinker_info *info;
- int srcu_idx;
- srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&shrinker_srcu);
- info = shrinker_info_srcu(memcg, nid);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ info = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info);
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(shrinker_id >= info->map_nr_max)) {
/* Pairs with smp mb in shrink_slab() */
smp_mb__before_atomic();
set_bit(shrinker_id, info->map);
}
- srcu_read_unlock(&shrinker_srcu, srcu_idx);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
}
@@ -374,6 +360,7 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
return -ENOSYS;
down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+ /* This may call shrinker, so it must use down_read_trylock() */
id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (id < 0)
goto unlock;
@@ -407,7 +394,7 @@ static long xchg_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
{
struct shrinker_info *info;
- info = shrinker_info_srcu(memcg, nid);
+ info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
return atomic_long_xchg(&info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id], 0);
}
@@ -416,7 +403,7 @@ static long add_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
{
struct shrinker_info *info;
- info = shrinker_info_srcu(memcg, nid);
+ info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]);
}
@@ -947,14 +934,15 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
{
struct shrinker_info *info;
unsigned long ret, freed = 0;
- int srcu_idx;
int i;
if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
return 0;
- srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&shrinker_srcu);
- info = shrinker_info_srcu(memcg, nid);
+ if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
+ return 0;
+
+ info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
if (unlikely(!info))
goto unlock;
@@ -1004,9 +992,14 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, i);
}
freed += ret;
+
+ if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
+ freed = freed ? : 1;
+ break;
+ }
}
unlock:
- srcu_read_unlock(&shrinker_srcu, srcu_idx);
+ up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
return freed;
}
#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 8:15 [PATCH 0/7] revert shrinker_srcu related changes Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 1/7] Revert "mm: shrinkers: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: remove shrinker_rwsem from synchronize_shrinkers()" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 3/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 4/7] Revert "mm: shrinkers: make count and scan in shrinker debugfs lockless" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: add shrinker_srcu_generation" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 7/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: make global slab shrink lockless" Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230609081518.3039120-7-qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox