From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, tkhai@ya.ru, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
vbabka@suse.cz, muchun.song@linux.dev, yujie.liu@intel.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] Revert "mm: shrinkers: make count and scan in shrinker debugfs lockless"
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 08:15:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230609081518.3039120-5-qi.zheng@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230609081518.3039120-1-qi.zheng@linux.dev>
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
This reverts commit 20cd1892fcc3efc10a7ac327cc3790494bec46b5.
Kernel test robot reports -88.8% regression in stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec
test case [1], which is caused by commit f95bdb700bc6 ("mm: vmscan: make
global slab shrink lockless"). The root cause is that SRCU has to be careful
to not frequently check for SRCU read-side critical section exits. Therefore,
even if no one is currently in the SRCU read-side critical section,
synchronize_srcu() cannot return quickly. That's why unregister_shrinker()
has become slower.
We will try to use the refcount+RCU method [2] proposed by Dave Chinner
to continue to re-implement the lockless slab shrink. So revert the
shrinker_srcu related changes first.
[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZIJhou1d55d4H1s0@dread.disaster.area/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
mm/shrinker_debug.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/shrinker_debug.c b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
index 2be15b8a6d0b..3ab53fad8876 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker_debug.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
@@ -5,12 +5,10 @@
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/shrinker.h>
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
-#include <linux/srcu.h>
/* defined in vmscan.c */
extern struct rw_semaphore shrinker_rwsem;
extern struct list_head shrinker_list;
-extern struct srcu_struct shrinker_srcu;
static DEFINE_IDA(shrinker_debugfs_ida);
static struct dentry *shrinker_debugfs_root;
@@ -51,13 +49,18 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
unsigned long total;
bool memcg_aware;
- int ret = 0, nid, srcu_idx;
+ int ret, nid;
count_per_node = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!count_per_node)
return -ENOMEM;
- srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&shrinker_srcu);
+ ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem);
+ if (ret) {
+ kfree(count_per_node);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ rcu_read_lock();
memcg_aware = shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
@@ -88,7 +91,8 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
}
} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
- srcu_read_unlock(&shrinker_srcu, srcu_idx);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
kfree(count_per_node);
return ret;
@@ -111,8 +115,9 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file,
.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
};
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
- int nid, srcu_idx;
+ int nid;
char kbuf[72];
+ ssize_t ret;
read_len = size < (sizeof(kbuf) - 1) ? size : (sizeof(kbuf) - 1);
if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len))
@@ -141,7 +146,11 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file,
return -EINVAL;
}
- srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&shrinker_srcu);
+ ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem);
+ if (ret) {
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+ return ret;
+ }
sc.nid = nid;
sc.memcg = memcg;
@@ -150,7 +159,7 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file,
shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, &sc);
- srcu_read_unlock(&shrinker_srcu, srcu_idx);
+ up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
return size;
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 8:15 [PATCH 0/7] revert shrinker_srcu related changes Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 1/7] Revert "mm: shrinkers: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: remove shrinker_rwsem from synchronize_shrinkers()" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 3/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: add shrinker_srcu_generation" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: make memcg slab shrink lockless" Qi Zheng
2023-06-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 7/7] Revert "mm: vmscan: make global " Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230609081518.3039120-5-qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox