Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] SPDX conversion from UDF

[Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>]

On Mon 22-05-23 11:53:08, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 22-05-23 07:54:33, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > This small SPDX conversion series targets UDF file system, which is
> > splitted from v2 of my SPDX conversion series that is triggered by
> > Didi's GPL full name fixes [1]. It is done to ease review.
> > 
> > All boilerplates in fs/udf/ is converted, except fs/udf/ecma_167.h.
> > The latter file apparently looks like 2-clause BSD Source-Code
> > license, yet the second clause is from third clause of 3-Clause BSD.
> > This custom license can't be expressed satisfiably in SPDX license
> > identifier, hence the file doesn't get converted.
> > 
> > This series is based on mm-nonmm-unstable branch.
> > 
> > Changes since v1 [2]:
> >   * Correct SPDX tag for LGPL (correct spdxcheck warning)
> > 
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spdx/20230512100620.36807-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com/
> > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230517083344.1090863-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com/
> > 
> > Bagas Sanjaya (2):
> >   fs: udf: Replace GPL 2.0 boilerplate license notice with SPDX
> >     identifier
> >   fs: udf: udftime: Replace LGPL boilerplate with SPDX identifier
> 
> The patches look good to me. So unless someone objects in a few days, I'll
> queue them into my tree. Thanks!

Patches queued now.

								Honza