From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
dennis@kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
gor@linux.ibm.com, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Introduce cmpxchg128() -- aka. the demise of cmpxchg_double()
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:39:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230524093947.GQ83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4975b92f-92f6-4d50-8386-9add12ddfd61@app.fastmail.com>
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:42:23AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The need for runtime feature checking in the callers on x86-64 is still
> a bit awkward, but this is no worse than before. I understand that
> turning this into a compile-time choice would require first settling
> a larger debate about raising the default target for distros beyond
> the current CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU.
Looks like Power is going to be in the same boat, they can do
cmpxchg128, but only for Power8+.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-15 7:56 Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] cyrpto/b128ops: Remove struct u128 Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] types: Introduce [us]128 Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] arch: Introduce arch_{,try_}_cmpxchg128{,_local}() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] instrumentation: Wire up cmpxchg128() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] percpu: Wire up cmpxchg128 Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-25 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-25 22:59 ` Petr Tesařík
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] x86,amd_iommu: Replace cmpxchg_double() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] x86,intel_iommu: " Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] slub: " Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-24 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-24 10:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-25 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-25 10:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-25 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-30 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-30 19:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] mm/slub: Fold slab_update_freelist() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-24 11:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] arch: Remove cmpxchg_double Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 8:52 ` Heiko Carstens
2023-05-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] s390/cpum_sf: Convert to cmpxchg128() Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Introduce cmpxchg128() -- aka. the demise of cmpxchg_double() Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-24 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230524093947.GQ83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox