From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Theodore T'so <tytso@mit.edu>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 12:38:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230523-bekochen-makaber-6edbaa685390@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523100240.mgeu4y46friv7hau@quack3>
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:02:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 18-05-23 07:47:35, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > The VFS always uses coarse-grained timestamp updates for filling out the
> > ctime and mtime after a change. This has the benefit of allowing
> > filesystems to optimize away a lot metadata updates, down to around 1
> > per jiffy, even when a file is under heavy writes.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this has always been an issue when we're exporting via
> > NFSv3, which relies on timestamps to validate caches. Even with NFSv4, a
> > lot of exported filesystems don't properly support a change attribute
> > and are subject to the same problems with timestamp granularity. Other
> > applications have similar issues (e.g backup applications).
> >
> > Switching to always using fine-grained timestamps would improve the
> > situation, but that becomes rather expensive, as the underlying
> > filesystem will have to log a lot more metadata updates.
> >
> > What we need is a way to only use fine-grained timestamps when they are
> > being actively queried.
> >
> > The kernel always stores normalized ctime values, so only the first 30
> > bits of the tv_nsec field are ever used. Whenever the mtime changes, the
> > ctime must also change.
> >
> > Use the 31st bit of the ctime tv_nsec field to indicate that something
> > has queried the inode for the i_mtime or i_ctime. When this flag is set,
> > on the next timestamp update, the kernel can fetch a fine-grained
> > timestamp instead of the usual coarse-grained one.
> >
> > This patch adds the infrastructure this scheme. Filesytems can opt
> > into it by setting the FS_MULTIGRAIN_TS flag in the fstype.
> >
> > Later patches will convert individual filesystems over to use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
>
> So there are two things I dislike about this series because I think they
> are fragile:
>
> 1) If we have a filesystem supporting multigrain ts and someone
> accidentally directly uses the value of inode->i_ctime, he can get bogus
> value (with QUERIED flag). This mistake is very easy to do. So I think we
> should rename i_ctime to something like __i_ctime and always use accessor
> function for it.
>
> 2) As I already commented in a previous version of the series, the scheme
> with just one flag for both ctime and mtime and flag getting cleared in
> current_time() relies on the fact that filesystems always do an equivalent
> of:
>
> inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = current_time();
>
> Otherwise we can do coarse grained update where we should have done a fine
> grained one. Filesystems often update timestamps like this but not
> universally. Grepping shows some instances where only inode->i_mtime is set
> from current_time() e.g. in autofs or bfs. Again a mistake that is rather
> easy to make and results in subtle issues. I think this would be also
> nicely solved by renaming i_ctime to __i_ctime and using a function to set
> ctime. Mtime could then be updated with inode->i_mtime = ctime_peek().
>
> I understand this is quite some churn but a very mechanical one that could
> be just done with Coccinelle and a few manual fixups. So IMHO it is worth
> the more robust result.
Yeah, these are all good points.
>
> Some more nits below.
>
> > +/**
> > + * current_mg_time - Return FS time (possibly fine-grained)
> > + * @inode: inode.
> > + *
> > + * Return the current time truncated to the time granularity supported by
> > + * the fs, as suitable for a ctime/mtime change. If the ctime is flagged
> > + * as having been QUERIED, get a fine-grained timestamp.
> > + */
>
> The comment should also mention that QUERIED flag is cleared from the ctime.
>
> > +static struct timespec64 current_mg_time(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > + struct timespec64 now;
> > + atomic_long_t *pnsec = (atomic_long_t *)&inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec;
> > + long nsec = atomic_long_fetch_andnot(I_CTIME_QUERIED, pnsec);
> > +
> > + if (nsec & I_CTIME_QUERIED) {
> > + ktime_get_real_ts64(&now);
> > + } else {
> > + struct timespec64 ctime;
> > +
> > + ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(&now);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If we've recently fetched a fine-grained timestamp
> > + * then the coarse-grained one may still be earlier than the
> > + * existing one. Just keep the existing ctime if so.
> > + */
> > + ctime = ctime_peek(inode);
> > + if (timespec64_compare(&ctime, &now) > 0)
> > + now = ctime;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return now;
> > +}
> > +
>
> ...
>
> > +/**
> > + * ctime_nsec_peek - peek at (but don't query) the ctime tv_nsec field
> > + * @inode: inode to fetch the ctime from
> > + *
> > + * Grab the current ctime tv_nsec field from the inode, mask off the
> > + * I_CTIME_QUERIED flag and return it. This is mostly intended for use by
> > + * internal consumers of the ctime that aren't concerned with ensuring a
> > + * fine-grained update on the next change (e.g. when preparing to store
> > + * the value in the backing store for later retrieval).
> > + *
> > + * This is safe to call regardless of whether the underlying filesystem
> > + * is using multigrain timestamps.
> > + */
> > +static inline long ctime_nsec_peek(const struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > + return inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec &~ I_CTIME_QUERIED;
>
> This is somewhat unusual spacing. I'd use:
>
> inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec & ~I_CTIME_QUERIED
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * ctime_peek - peek at (but don't query) the ctime
> > + * @inode: inode to fetch the ctime from
> > + *
> > + * Grab the current ctime from the inode, sans I_CTIME_QUERIED flag. For
> > + * use by internal consumers that don't require a fine-grained update on
> > + * the next change.
> > + *
> > + * This is safe to call regardless of whether the underlying filesystem
> > + * is using multigrain timestamps.
> > + */
> > +static inline struct timespec64 ctime_peek(const struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > + struct timespec64 ctime;
> > +
> > + ctime.tv_sec = inode->i_ctime.tv_sec;
> > + ctime.tv_nsec = ctime_nsec_peek(inode);
> > +
> > + return ctime;
> > +}
>
> Given this is in a header that gets included in a lot of places, maybe we
> should call it like inode_ctime_peek() or inode_ctime_get() to reduce
> chances of a name clash?
I think I mentioned this in an earlier comment. Independent of this
series, it would be kinda nice if we could start moving stuff out of
fs.h so we end up with a finer grained split of fs.h.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-23 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 11:47 [PATCH v4 0/9] fs: implement multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] fs: pass the request_mask to generic_fillattr Jeff Layton
2023-05-23 9:17 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime Jeff Layton
2023-05-23 10:02 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-23 10:17 ` Jan Kara
2023-05-23 10:56 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-23 11:01 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-23 11:15 ` Jeff Layton
2023-06-13 19:47 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-23 10:38 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-05-23 10:40 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-23 12:46 ` Jan Kara
2023-06-13 13:09 ` Jeff Layton
2023-06-14 6:29 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] overlayfs: allow it to handle multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] nfsd: ensure we use ctime_peek to grab the inode->i_ctime Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 13:43 ` Chuck Lever III
2023-05-18 15:31 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-19 10:36 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-19 11:22 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] ksmbd: use ctime_peek to grab the ctime out of the inode Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] tmpfs: add support for multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] xfs: switch to " Jeff Layton
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] ext4: convert " Jeff Layton
2023-05-20 20:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-05-18 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] btrfs: " Jeff Layton
2023-05-22 9:56 ` David Sterba
2023-05-22 10:08 ` Jeff Layton
2023-05-22 10:53 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-22 9:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] fs: implement " Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230523-bekochen-makaber-6edbaa685390@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox