linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, Olivier Dion <odion@efficios.com>,
	michael.christie@oracle.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: Move mm_count into its own cache line
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 10:35:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230515143536.114960-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)

The mm_struct mm_count field is frequently updated by mmgrab/mmdrop
performed by context switch. This causes false-sharing for surrounding
mm_struct fields which are read-mostly.

This has been observed on a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire
Rapids server running hackbench, and by the kernel test robot
will-it-scale testcase.

Move the mm_count field into its own cache line to prevent false-sharing
with other mm_struct fields.

Move mm_count to the first field of mm_struct to minimize the amount of
padding required: rather than adding padding before and after the
mm_count field, padding is only added after mm_count.

Note that I noticed this odd comment in mm_struct:

commit 2e3025434a6b ("mm: relocate 'write_protect_seq' in struct mm_struct")

                /*
                 * With some kernel config, the current mmap_lock's offset
                 * inside 'mm_struct' is at 0x120, which is very optimal, as
                 * its two hot fields 'count' and 'owner' sit in 2 different
                 * cachelines,  and when mmap_lock is highly contended, both
                 * of the 2 fields will be accessed frequently, current layout
                 * will help to reduce cache bouncing.
                 *
                 * So please be careful with adding new fields before
                 * mmap_lock, which can easily push the 2 fields into one
                 * cacheline.
                 */
                struct rw_semaphore mmap_lock;

This comment is rather odd for a few reasons:

- It requires addition/removal of mm_struct fields to carefully consider
  field alignment of _other_ fields,
- It expresses the wish to keep an "optimal" alignment for a specific
  kernel config.

I suspect that the author of this comment may want to revisit this topic
and perhaps introduce a split-struct approach for struct rw_semaphore,
if the need is to place various fields of this structure in different
cache lines.

Fixes: 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
Fixes: af7f588d8f73 ("sched: Introduce per-memory-map concurrency ID")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a0c1db1-103d-d518-ed96-1584a28fbf32@efficios.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202305151017.27581d75-yujie.liu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Olivier Dion <odion@efficios.com>
Cc: michael.christie@oracle.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
---
 include/linux/mm_types.h | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 306a3d1a0fa6..de10fc797c8e 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -583,6 +583,21 @@ struct mm_cid {
 struct kioctx_table;
 struct mm_struct {
 	struct {
+		/*
+		 * Fields which are often written to are placed in a separate
+		 * cache line.
+		 */
+		struct {
+			/**
+			 * @mm_count: The number of references to &struct
+			 * mm_struct (@mm_users count as 1).
+			 *
+			 * Use mmgrab()/mmdrop() to modify. When this drops to
+			 * 0, the &struct mm_struct is freed.
+			 */
+			atomic_t mm_count;
+		} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+
 		struct maple_tree mm_mt;
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 		unsigned long (*get_unmapped_area) (struct file *filp,
@@ -620,14 +635,6 @@ struct mm_struct {
 		 */
 		atomic_t mm_users;
 
-		/**
-		 * @mm_count: The number of references to &struct mm_struct
-		 * (@mm_users count as 1).
-		 *
-		 * Use mmgrab()/mmdrop() to modify. When this drops to 0, the
-		 * &struct mm_struct is freed.
-		 */
-		atomic_t mm_count;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID
 		/**
 		 * @pcpu_cid: Per-cpu current cid.
-- 
2.25.1



             reply	other threads:[~2023-05-15 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-15 14:35 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2023-05-16  4:40 ` Aaron Lu
2023-05-16  6:53 ` Feng Tang
2023-06-16 18:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-06-16 20:16 ` Andrew Morton
2023-06-16 20:38   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-06-16 22:35     ` John Hubbard
2023-06-17 16:08       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-06-16 22:39 ` John Hubbard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230515143536.114960-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=odion@efficios.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox