From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/32] mm: Bring back vmalloc_exec
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 23:48:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230510064849.GC1851@quark.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZFq7JhrhyrMTNfd/@moria.home.lan>
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:29:10PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 02:12:41PM -0700, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 01:46:09PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 12:56:32PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > This is needed for bcachefs, which dynamically generates per-btree node
> > > > unpack functions.
> > >
> > > No, we will never add back a way for random code allocating executable
> > > memory in kernel space.
> >
> > Yeah I think I glossed over this aspect a bit as it looks ostensibly like simply
> > reinstating a helper function because the code is now used in more than one
> > place (at lsf/mm so a little distracted :)
> >
> > But it being exported is a problem. Perhaps there's another way of acheving the
> > same aim without having to do so?
>
> None that I see.
>
> The background is that bcachefs generates a per btree node unpack
> function, based on the packed format for that btree node, for unpacking
> keys within that node. The unpack function is only ~50 bytes, and for
> locality we want it to be located with the btree node's other in-memory
> lookup tables so they can be prefetched all at once.
>
> Here's the codegen:
>
> https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git/tree/fs/bcachefs/bkey.c#n727
Well, it's a cool trick, but it's not clear that it actually belongs in
production kernel code. What else in the kernel actually does dynamic codegen?
Just BPF, I think?
Among other issues, this is entirely architecture-specific, and it may cause
interoperability issues with various other features, including security
features. Is it really safe to leave a W&X page around, for example?
What seems to be missing is any explanation for what we're actually getting from
this extremely unusual solution that cannot be gained any other way. What is
unique about bcachefs that it really needs something like this?
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-10 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-09 16:56 [PATCH 00/32] bcachefs - a new COW filesystem Kent Overstreet
2023-05-09 16:56 ` [PATCH 07/32] mm: Bring back vmalloc_exec Kent Overstreet
2023-05-09 18:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-09 20:15 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-09 20:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-09 21:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-09 21:29 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-10 6:48 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2023-05-12 18:36 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-13 1:57 ` Eric Biggers
2023-05-13 19:28 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-14 5:45 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-14 18:43 ` Eric Biggers
2023-05-15 5:38 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-15 6:13 ` Eric Biggers
2023-05-15 6:18 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-15 7:13 ` Eric Biggers
2023-05-15 7:26 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-21 21:33 ` Eric Biggers
2023-05-21 22:04 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-15 10:29 ` David Laight
2023-05-10 11:56 ` David Laight
2023-05-09 21:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-09 21:54 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-11 5:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-05-11 5:44 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-13 13:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-14 18:39 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-05-14 23:43 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-15 4:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-05-15 5:02 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-10 14:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-05-10 15:05 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-05-11 22:28 ` Kees Cook
2023-05-12 18:41 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-16 21:02 ` Kees Cook
2023-05-16 21:20 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-16 21:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-16 21:57 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-17 5:28 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-17 14:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-05-17 14:18 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-05-17 15:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-05-17 15:59 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-17 4:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-06-17 15:34 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-17 19:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-06-17 20:08 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-17 20:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-06-19 19:45 ` Kees Cook
2023-06-20 0:39 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-19 9:19 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-19 10:47 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-19 12:47 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-19 19:17 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-20 17:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-06-20 18:08 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-20 18:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-06-20 18:48 ` Dave Hansen
2023-06-20 20:18 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-20 20:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-06-20 22:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-06-20 22:43 ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-21 1:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-06-15 20:41 ` [PATCH 00/32] bcachefs - a new COW filesystem Pavel Machek
2023-06-15 21:26 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230510064849.GC1851@quark.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox