From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ruihan Li <lrh2000@pku.edu.cn>,
syzbot+fcf1a817ceb50935ce99@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: usbdev_mmap causes type confusion in page_table_check
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 16:01:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023050934-launch-shifty-0bbb@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZFpJ1rs+XinCYfPs@infradead.org>
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:25:42AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 09:58:44PM +0800, Ruihan Li wrote:
> > static int usbdev_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > {
> > // ...
> > mem = usb_alloc_coherent(ps->dev, size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN,
> > &dma_handle);
> > // ...
> > if (hcd->localmem_pool || !hcd_uses_dma(hcd)) {
> > if (remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
> > virt_to_phys(usbm->mem) >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>
> usb_alloc_coherent and up in the DMA coherent allocator (usually
> anyway), and you absolutely must never do a virt_to_phys or virt_to_page
> on that return value. This code is a buggy as f**k.
Odd, you gave it a reviewed-by: in commit a0e710a7def4 ("USB: usbfs: fix
mmap dma mismatch") back in 2020 when it was merged as you said that was
the way to fix this up. :)
Do you have a better way to do it now that is more correct? Did some
DMA changes happen that missed this codepath getting fixed up?
thanks,
gre gk-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-05 0:46 [syzbot] [mm?] kernel BUG in page_table_check_clear syzbot
2023-05-07 13:58 ` usbdev_mmap causes type confusion in page_table_check Ruihan Li
2023-05-08 21:27 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-05-08 21:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-08 21:48 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-05-08 21:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-08 21:55 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-05-08 22:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-05-08 23:17 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-05-08 23:21 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-05-08 23:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-05-09 0:07 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-05-08 21:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-05-09 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-09 14:01 ` Greg KH [this message]
2023-05-10 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023050934-launch-shifty-0bbb@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrh2000@pku.edu.cn \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=syzbot+fcf1a817ceb50935ce99@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox