From: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com
Cc: surenb@google.com, colin.i.king@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, vbabka@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org,
mgorman@suse.de, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
hui.wang@canonical.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] mm/oom_kill: system enters a state something like hang when running stress-ng
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:10:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230426051030.112007-1-hui.wang@canonical.com> (raw)
When we run stress-ng on the UC (Ubuntu Core), the system will be in a
state similar to hang. And we found if a testcase could introduce the
oom (like stress-ng-bigheap, stress-ng-brk, ...) under the UC, it is
highly possible that this testcase will make the system be in a state
like hang. We had a discussion for this issue here:
https://github.com/ColinIanKing/stress-ng/pull/270
The root cause are Ubuntu Core is constructed on squashfs, and
out_of_memory() will not trigger the oom killer for an allocation
without __GFP_FS.
For squashfs side:
memalloc_nofs_save()
squashfs_readahead()--->...--->alloc_page() /* alloc without __GFP_FS */
memalloc_nofs_restore()
For oom side:
out_of_memory()
if (oc->gfp_mask && !(oc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) && !is_memcg_oom(oc))
return true;
In the out_of_memory(), this design exists for a long period of time,
If removing these 2 lines, the issue could be fixed. But I don't know
if it is allowed to do so or not. From my understanding, there will be
no problem to remove those 2 lines, since if the allocation without
__GFP_FS triggers the oom killer, the killer will select a process to
kill, it has no difference with an allocation with __GFP_FS.
Since this design exists for a long time, it is risky to change it,
here I use a kthread to trigger oom with __GFP_FS when needed, I think
it is a safer way to resolve this issue. Please help review it.
Thanks.
Hui Wang (1):
mm/oom_kill: trigger the oom killer if oom occurs without __GFP_FS
mm/oom_kill.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-04-26 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-26 5:10 Hui Wang [this message]
2023-04-26 5:10 ` [PATCH 1/1] mm/oom_kill: trigger the oom killer if oom occurs without __GFP_FS Hui Wang
2023-04-26 8:33 ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-26 11:07 ` Hui Wang
2023-04-26 16:44 ` Phillip Lougher
2023-04-26 17:38 ` Phillip Lougher
2023-04-26 18:26 ` Yang Shi
2023-04-26 19:06 ` Phillip Lougher
2023-04-26 19:34 ` Phillip Lougher
2023-04-27 0:42 ` Hui Wang
2023-04-27 1:37 ` Phillip Lougher
2023-04-27 5:22 ` Hui Wang
2023-04-27 1:18 ` Gao Xiang
2023-04-27 3:47 ` Hui Wang
2023-04-27 4:17 ` Gao Xiang
2023-04-27 7:03 ` Colin King (gmail)
2023-04-27 7:49 ` Hui Wang
2023-04-28 19:53 ` Michal Hocko
2023-05-03 11:49 ` Hui Wang
2023-05-03 12:20 ` Michal Hocko
2023-05-03 18:41 ` Phillip Lougher
2023-05-03 19:10 ` Phillip Lougher
2023-05-03 19:38 ` Hui Wang
2023-05-07 21:07 ` Phillip Lougher
2023-05-08 10:05 ` Hui Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230426051030.112007-1-hui.wang@canonical.com \
--to=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox