linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:07:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230426-bahnanlagen-ausmusterung-4877cbf40d4c@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230424151104.175456-2-jlayton@kernel.org>

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 11:11:02AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The VFS always uses coarse-grained timestamp updates for filling out the
> ctime and mtime after a change. This has the benefit of allowing
> filesystems to optimize away a lot metaupdates, to around once per
> jiffy, even when a file is under heavy writes.
> 
> Unfortunately, this has always been an issue when we're exporting via
> NFSv3, which relies on timestamps to validate caches. Even with NFSv4, a
> lot of exported filesystems don't properly support a change attribute
> and are subject to the same problems with timestamp granularity. Other
> applications have similar issues (e.g backup applications).
> 
> Switching to always using fine-grained timestamps would improve the
> situation for NFS, but that becomes rather expensive, as the underlying
> filesystem will have to log a lot more metadata updates.
> 
> What we need is a way to only use fine-grained timestamps when they are
> being actively queried:
> 
> Whenever the mtime changes, the ctime must also change since we're
> changing the metadata. When a superblock has a s_time_gran >1, we can
> use the lowest-order bit of the inode->i_ctime as a flag to indicate
> that the value has been queried. Then on the next write, we'll fetch a
> fine-grained timestamp instead of the usual coarse-grained one.
> 
> We could enable this for any filesystem that has a s_time_gran >1, but
> for now, this patch adds a new SB_MULTIGRAIN_TS flag to allow filesystems
> to opt-in to this behavior.

Hm, the patch raises the flag in s_flags. Please at least move this to
s_iflags as SB_I_MULTIGRAIN and treat this as an internal flag. There's
no need to give the impression that this will become a mount option.

Also, this looks like it's a filesystem property not a superblock
property as the granularity isn't changeable. So shouldn't this be an
FS_* flag instead?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-26  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-24 15:11 [PATCH v2 0/3] fs: multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2023-04-24 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime Jeff Layton
2023-04-24 21:47   ` NeilBrown
2023-04-24 22:30     ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-24 22:40       ` NeilBrown
2023-04-25 17:45         ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-25 17:56           ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-04-25 19:12             ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-26  6:41       ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-26  6:53   ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-26  9:46     ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27  9:44       ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-26  7:07   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-04-26  9:48     ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27  9:51       ` Christian Brauner
2023-04-27  9:57         ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-24 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] shmem: mark for high-res timestamps on next update after getattr Jeff Layton
2023-04-24 15:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs: mark the inode for high-res timestamp update in getattr Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230426-bahnanlagen-ausmusterung-4877cbf40d4c@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox