Re: linux-6.3-rc6/lib/maple_tree.c: Two style issues

["Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>]

* David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com> [230417 10:23]:
> Hello there,
> 
> >It should be fine here. 
> 
> Perhaps I have been slightly less than clear. The discussion is about the *style*
> of the code, *not* whether it works or not. My apologies for the lack of clarity. 
> 
> Expression is
> 
>     while (A &&
>         B && C)
> 
> The static analyser notices it is poor style to have B do a limit check, but have A use it.
> Sure its working code, but suggest new code
> 
>     while (B && A && C)
> 
> It won't make much difference to the code, it will merely be better style.
> 
> 2.
> 
> >> Source code is
> >>
> >>             memset(pivs + tmp, 0,
> >>                     sizeof(unsigned long *) * (max_p - tmp));
> 
> >It's not good here, I can fix it.
> 
> sizeof( pivs[ 0]) is a better thing to say than sizeof( unsigned long). 
> There is reduced future maintenance burden, when the type of *pivs changes.
> 

If you want to make the code better, then send a patch.  It is very
frustrating to try and decode a compilers output over email and be told
it wasn't decoded to your liking.

This is far more of a maintenance burden than the code you are trying to change.