From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"42.hyeyoo@gmail.com" <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"roman.gushchin@linux.dev" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
"rientjes@google.com" <rientjes@google.com>,
"penberg@kernel.org" <penberg@kernel.org>,
"cl@linux.com" <cl@linux.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@bytedance.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: annotate kmem_cache_node->list_lock as raw_spinlock
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:40:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230413074013.GD4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76e15f10-d3f1-2cab-63cb-25aa3b4f2cd4@bytedance.com>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:44:42AM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> > Something like the completely untested below might be of help..
> I just tested the above code, and then got the following
> warning:
>
> It seems that the LD_WAIT_SLEEP we set is already greater than the
> LD_WAIT_SPIN of the current context.
Yeah, I'm an idiot and got it wrong.. I'll try again later if I manage
to wake up today :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-13 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-11 13:08 Qi Zheng
2023-04-11 13:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-11 14:08 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-11 14:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-11 14:25 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-12 5:51 ` Boqun Feng
2023-04-12 6:44 ` Zhang, Qiang1
2023-04-12 6:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-12 7:30 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-12 8:32 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-12 13:09 ` Waiman Long
2023-04-12 16:47 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-12 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-12 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-12 16:44 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-13 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-04-25 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-25 15:51 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-29 10:06 ` [PATCH] debugobjects,locking: Annotate __debug_object_init() wait type violation Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 14:49 ` [PATCH] mm: slub: annotate kmem_cache_node->list_lock as raw_spinlock Qi Zheng
2023-04-12 6:57 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-13 0:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-13 1:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-12 6:45 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230413074013.GD4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zhaogongyi@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox