From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm: hwpoison: support recovery from HugePage copy-on-write faults
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:56:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230412155618.720e6b3aa5be6444f7889ea6@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412222138.GB4759@monkey>
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:21:38 -0700 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > Commit a873dfe1032a ("mm, hwpoison: try to recover from copy-on write
> > > faults") introduced the routine copy_user_highpage_mc() to gracefully
> > > handle copying of user pages with uncorrectable errors. Previously,
> > > such copies would result in a kernel crash. hugetlb has separate code
> > > paths for copy-on-write and does not benefit from the changes made in
> > > commit a873dfe1032a.
>
> I was just going to suggest adding the line,
>
> Hence, copy-on-write of hugetlb user pages with uncorrectable errors
> will result in a kernel crash as was the case with 'normal' pages before
> commit a873dfe1032a.
>
> However, I'm guessing it might be more clear if we start with the
> runtime effects. Something like:
>
> copy-on-write of hugetlb user pages with uncorrectable errors will result
> in a kernel crash. This is because the copy is performed in kernel mode
> and in general we can not handle accessing memory with such errors while
> in kernel mode. Commit a873dfe1032a ("mm, hwpoison: try to recover from
> copy-on write faults") introduced the routine copy_user_highpage_mc() to
> gracefully handle copying of user pages with uncorrectable errors. However,
> the separate hugetlb copy-on-write code paths were not modified as part
> of commit a873dfe1032a.
Sounds good. So I assume cc:stable is desirable.
I can't actually get the patch to apply to anything. Can we please
have a redo against current -linus?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-11 9:27 Liu Shixin
2023-04-12 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2023-04-12 18:13 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-04-12 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
2023-04-12 22:21 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-04-12 22:56 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-04-12 23:37 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-04-13 0:47 ` Luck, Tony
2023-04-13 1:55 ` Liu Shixin
2023-04-13 1:51 ` Liu Shixin
2023-04-13 1:49 ` Liu Shixin
2023-04-13 12:57 ` Jiaqi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230412155618.720e6b3aa5be6444f7889ea6@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox