linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	"42.hyeyoo@gmail.com" <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"roman.gushchin@linux.dev" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	"rientjes@google.com" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"penberg@kernel.org" <penberg@kernel.org>,
	"cl@linux.com" <cl@linux.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@bytedance.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: annotate kmem_cache_node->list_lock as raw_spinlock
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:47:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230412124735.GE628377@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6a21ac6-939c-c686-387b-20f81ba5be53@suse.cz>

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 08:50:29AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

> > --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
> > +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
> > @@ -562,10 +562,10 @@ __debug_object_init(void *addr, const struct debug_obj_descr *descr, int onstack
> >         unsigned long flags;
> > 
> >         /*
> > -        * On RT enabled kernels the pool refill must happen in preemptible
> > +        * The pool refill must happen in preemptible
> >          * context:
> >          */
> > -       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) || preemptible())
> > +       if (preemptible())
> >                 fill_pool();
> 
> +CC Peterz
> 
> Aha so this is in fact another case where the code is written with
> actual differences between PREEMPT_RT and !PREEMPT_RT in mind, but
> CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING always assumes PREEMPT_RT?

Ooh, tricky, yes. PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING always follows the PREEMP_RT
rules and does not expect trickery like the above.

Something like the completely untested below might be of help..

---
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep_types.h b/include/linux/lockdep_types.h
index d22430840b53..f3120d6a7d9e 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep_types.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ enum lockdep_wait_type {
 enum lockdep_lock_type {
 	LD_LOCK_NORMAL = 0,	/* normal, catch all */
 	LD_LOCK_PERCPU,		/* percpu */
+	LD_LOCK_WAIT,		/* annotation */
 	LD_LOCK_MAX,
 };
 
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 50d4863974e7..a4077f5bb75b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2279,8 +2279,9 @@ static inline bool usage_skip(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask)
 	 * As a result, we will skip local_lock(), when we search for irq
 	 * inversion bugs.
 	 */
-	if (entry->class->lock_type == LD_LOCK_PERCPU) {
-		if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(entry->class->wait_type_inner < LD_WAIT_CONFIG))
+	if (entry->class->lock_type != LD_LOCK_NORMAL) {
+		if (entry->class->lock_type == LD_LOCK_PERCPU &&
+		    DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(entry->class->wait_type_inner < LD_WAIT_CONFIG))
 			return false;
 
 		return true;
@@ -4752,7 +4753,8 @@ static int check_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
 
 	for (; depth < curr->lockdep_depth; depth++) {
 		struct held_lock *prev = curr->held_locks + depth;
-		u8 prev_inner = hlock_class(prev)->wait_type_inner;
+		struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(prev);
+		u8 prev_inner = class->wait_type_inner;
 
 		if (prev_inner) {
 			/*
@@ -4762,6 +4764,12 @@ static int check_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
 			 * Also due to trylocks.
 			 */
 			curr_inner = min(curr_inner, prev_inner);
+
+			/*
+			 * Allow override for annotations.
+			 */
+			if (unlikely(class->lock_type == LD_LOCK_WAIT))
+				curr_inner = prev_inner;
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
index df86e649d8be..fae71ef72a16 100644
--- a/lib/debugobjects.c
+++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
@@ -565,8 +565,16 @@ __debug_object_init(void *addr, const struct debug_obj_descr *descr, int onstack
 	 * On RT enabled kernels the pool refill must happen in preemptible
 	 * context:
 	 */
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) || preemptible())
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) || preemptible()) {
+		static lockdep_map dep_map = {
+			.name = "wait-type-override",
+			.wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_SLEEP,
+			.lock_type = LD_LOCK_WAIT,
+		};
+		lock_map_acquire(&dep_map);
 		fill_pool();
+		lock_map_release(&dep_map);
+	}
 
 	db = get_bucket((unsigned long) addr);
 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-11 13:08 Qi Zheng
2023-04-11 13:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-11 14:08   ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-11 14:19     ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-11 14:25       ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-12  5:51         ` Boqun Feng
2023-04-12  6:44           ` Zhang, Qiang1
2023-04-12  6:50             ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-12  7:30               ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-12  8:32                 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-12 13:09                   ` Waiman Long
2023-04-12 16:47                     ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-12 12:48                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-12 12:47               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-04-12 16:44                 ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-13  7:40                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-25 15:03                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-25 15:51                       ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-29 10:06                         ` [PATCH] debugobjects,locking: Annotate __debug_object_init() wait type violation Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-13 14:49                   ` [PATCH] mm: slub: annotate kmem_cache_node->list_lock as raw_spinlock Qi Zheng
2023-04-12  6:57             ` Qi Zheng
2023-04-13  0:24               ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-13  1:55                 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-12  6:45           ` Qi Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230412124735.GE628377@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=zhaogongyi@bytedance.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox