From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@loongson.cn>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: don't WARN when alloc/free-ing device private pages
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 13:07:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406130720.ba11ed2de992cc4c2485ad5d@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230406040515.383238-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 21:05:15 -0700 John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> wrote:
> Although CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE and hmm_range_fault() and related
> functionality was first developed on x86, it also works on arm64.
> However, when trying this out on an arm64 system, it turns out that
> there is a massive slowdown during the setup and teardown phases.
>
> This slowdown is due to lots of calls to WARN_ON()'s that are checking
> for pages that are out of the physical range for the CPU. However,
> that's a design feature of device private pages: they are specfically
> chosen in order to be outside of the range of the CPU's true physical
> pages.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1157,8 +1157,10 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, int node,
> int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,
> struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> {
> +/* Device private pages are outside of the CPU's physical page range. */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE
> WARN_ON((start < VMEMMAP_START) || (end > VMEMMAP_END));
For a simple expression like this to cause a "massive slowdown", I
assume the WARN is triggering. But changelog doesn't mention massive
dmesg spewage?
Given Ard's comments, perhaps a switch to WARN_ON_ONCE() would suit?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-06 4:05 John Hubbard
2023-04-06 7:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-04-07 0:13 ` John Hubbard
2023-04-07 10:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-04-10 7:39 ` John Hubbard
2023-04-11 2:48 ` John Hubbard
2023-05-12 14:42 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-13 2:06 ` John Hubbard
2023-04-06 20:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-04-06 20:18 ` John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230406130720.ba11ed2de992cc4c2485ad5d@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenfeiyang@loongson.cn \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox