From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, osalvador@suse.de, vbabka@suse.cz,
william.lam@bytedance.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: compaction: fix the possible deadlock when isolating hugetlb pages
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 11:39:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230405103910.t2774qzhs2tne72q@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ab3bffebe59fb419234a68dec1e4572a2518563.1678962352.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 07:06:47PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> When trying to isolate a migratable pageblock, it can contain several
> normal pages or several hugetlb pages (e.g. CONT-PTE 64K hugetlb on arm64)
> in a pageblock. That means we may hold the lru lock of a normal page to
> continue to isolate the next hugetlb page by isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page()
> in the same migratable pageblock.
>
> However in the isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(), it may allocate a new hugetlb
> page and dissolve the old one by alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_folio() if the
> hugetlb's refcount is zero. That means we can still enter the direct compaction
> path to allocate a new hugetlb page under the current lru lock, which
> may cause possible deadlock.
>
> To avoid this possible deadlock, we should release the lru lock when trying
> to isolate a hugetbl page. Moreover it does not make sense to take the lru
> lock to isolate a hugetlb, which is not in the lru list.
>
> Fixes: 369fa227c219 ("mm: make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages")
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-16 11:06 [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: compaction: consider the number of scanning compound pages in isolate fail path Baolin Wang
2023-03-16 11:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: compaction: fix the possible deadlock when isolating hugetlb pages Baolin Wang
2023-04-05 10:39 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2023-03-16 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: compaction: consider the number of scanning compound pages in isolate fail path Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-05 10:31 ` Mel Gorman
2023-04-12 3:15 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230405103910.t2774qzhs2tne72q@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=william.lam@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox