From: xu xin <xu.xin.sc@gmail.com>
To: david@redhat.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn, xu.xin.sc@gmail.com,
xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] ksm: support tracking KSM-placed zero-pages
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:06:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230330120654.120937-1-xu.xin16@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78e35d88-8a4e-3b36-bbbd-94048c0c5b54@redhat.com>
Hi, I'm sorry to reply so late because I was so busy with my job matters recently.
I appreciate David's idea of simplifying the implement of tracking KSM-placed zero pages.
But I'm confused with how to implement that via pte_mkdirty/pte_dirty without affecting
other functions now and in the future.
>
>I already shared some feedback in [1]. I think we should try to simplify
>this handling, as proposed in that mail. Still waiting for a reply.
>
>[1]
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/9d7a8be3-ee9e-3492-841b-a0af9952ef36@redhat.com/
I have some questions about using pte_mkdirty to mark KSM-placed zero pages.
(1) Will KSM using pte_mkdirty to mark KSM-placed zero pages collides with the existing
handling of the same pte in other featutes? And in the future, what if there are new
codes also using pte_mkdirty for other goals.
(2) Can the literal meaning of pte_mkdiry represents a pte that points to ksm zero page?
(3) Suppose we use the pte_mkdirty approach, how to update/decline the count of ksm_zero_pages
when upper app writting on the page triggers COW(Copy on Write)? In *mm_fault outside
mm/ksm.c ?
Move the previos message here to reply together.
>The problem with this approach I see is that it fundamentally relies on
>the rmap/stable-tree to detect whether a zeropage was placed or not.
>
>I was wondering, why we even need an rmap item *at all* anymore. Why
>can't we place the shared zeropage an call it a day (remove the rmap
>item)? Once we placed a shared zeropage, the next KSM scan should better
>just ignore it, it's already deduplicated.
The reason is as follows ...
Initially, all scanned pages by ksmd will be assigned a rmap_item storing the page
information and ksm information, which helps ksmd can know every scanned pages' status and
update all counts especialy when COW happens. But since use_zero_pages feature was merged,
the situation changed, ksm zero pages is the only exception of ksm-scanned page without owning
a rmap_item in KSM, which leads to ksmd even don't know the existing of KSM-placed, and thus
causes the problem of our patches aimed to solve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-10 1:15 yang.yang29
2023-03-13 13:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-13 14:10 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-03-13 16:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-28 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2023-03-30 4:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-30 12:06 ` xu xin [this message]
2023-04-03 15:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-14 1:35 ` xu xin
2023-04-14 8:40 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230330120654.120937-1-xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--to=xu.xin.sc@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox