From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] selftests/mm: Implement support for arm64 on va
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:49:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230323144910.b07df164acc1d85bc76dc933@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230323105243.2807166-1-chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com>
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 16:22:38 +0530 Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com> wrote:
> The va_128TBswitch selftest is designed and implemented for PowerPC and
> x86 architectures which support a 128TB switch, up to 256TB of virtual
> address space and hugepage sizes of 16MB and 2MB respectively. Arm64
> platforms on the other hand support a 256Tb switch, up to 4PB of virtual
> address space and a default hugepage size of 512MB when 64k pagesize is
> enabled.
>
> These architectural differences require introducing support for arm64
> platforms, after which a more generic naming convention is suggested.
> The in code comments are amended to provide a more platform independent
> explanation of the working of the code and nr_hugepages are configured
> as required. Finally, the file running the testcase is modified in order
> to prevent skipping of hugetlb testcases of va_high_addr_switch.
>
> This series has been tested on 6.3.0-rc3 kernel, both on arm64 and x86
> platforms.
Would it make sense to get this series into the ARM tree, so it sees
more testing on ARM?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-23 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-23 10:52 Chaitanya S Prakash
2023-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests/mm: Add support for arm64 platform on va switch Chaitanya S Prakash
2023-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] selftests/mm: Rename va_128TBswitch to va_high_addr_switch Chaitanya S Prakash
2023-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/mm: Add platform independent in code comments Chaitanya S Prakash
2023-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/mm: Configure nr_hugepages for arm64 Chaitanya S Prakash
2023-03-23 10:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/mm: Run hugetlb testcases of va switch Chaitanya S Prakash
2023-03-23 11:14 ` [PATCH 0/5] selftests/mm: Implement support for arm64 on va Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-03-23 11:59 ` Mark Rutland
2023-03-23 21:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-03-24 10:15 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-04-05 4:22 ` Chaitanya S Prakash
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230323144910.b07df164acc1d85bc76dc933@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox