From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev, maple-tree@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cleanup vma_merge() and improve mergeability tests
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:16:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230320141621.fm3iwh7khjhji6zc@revolver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230309111258.24079-1-vbabka@suse.cz>
Sorry for the late review, I've been away.
For the whole series,
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
* Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> [230309 06:18]:
> Also available in git:
> https://git.kernel.org/vbabka/h/vma_merge_cleanup-v1r2
>
> Changes since RFC:
> - rebased to 6.3-rc1, dropped first patch (urgent fix) that was merged there
> - reindent parameters of mergeability checks (suggested by willy on IRC)
>
> My initial goal here was to try making the check for vm_ops->close in
> is_mergeable_vma() only be applied for vma's that would be truly removed
> as part of the merge (see Patch 9). This would then allow reverting the
> quick fix d014cd7c1c35 ("mm, mremap: fix mremap() expanding for vma's
> with vm_ops->close()"). This was successful enough to allow the revert
> (Patch 10). Checks using can_vma_merge_before() are still pessimistic
> about possible vma removal, and making them precise would probably
> complicate the vma_merge() code too much.
>
> Liam's 6.3-rc1 simplification of vma_merge() and removal of
> __vma_adjust() was very much helpful in understanding the vma_merge()
> implementation and especially when vma removals can happen, which is now
> very obvious. While studing the code, I've found ways to make it
> hopefully even more easy to follow, so that's the patches 1-8. That made
> me also notice a bug that's now already fixed in 6.3-rc1.
>
> Vlastimil Babka (10):
> mm/mmap/vma_merge: use only primary pointers for preparing merge
> mm/mmap/vma_merge: use the proper vma pointer in case 3
> mm/mmap/vma_merge: use the proper vma pointers in cases 1 and 6
> mm/mmap/vma_merge: use the proper vma pointer in case 4
> mm/mmap/vma_merge: initialize mid and next in natural order
> mm/mmap/vma_merge: set mid to NULL if not applicable
> mm/mmap/vma_merge: rename adj_next to adj_start
> mm/mmap/vma_merge: convert mergeability checks to return bool
> mm/mmap: start distinguishing if vma can be removed in mergeability
> test
> mm/mremap: simplify vma expansion again
>
> mm/mmap.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> mm/mremap.c | 20 ++------
> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-20 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-09 11:12 Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm/mmap/vma_merge: use only primary pointers for preparing merge Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-14 22:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm/mmap/vma_merge: use the proper vma pointer in case 3 Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-15 19:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm/mmap/vma_merge: use the proper vma pointers in cases 1 and 6 Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-15 19:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm/mmap/vma_merge: use the proper vma pointer in case 4 Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-15 19:54 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm/mmap/vma_merge: initialize mid and next in natural order Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-15 20:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm/mmap/vma_merge: set mid to NULL if not applicable Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-15 21:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-16 10:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm/mmap/vma_merge: rename adj_next to adj_start Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-14 22:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-15 21:38 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm/mmap/vma_merge: convert mergeability checks to return bool Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-15 21:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm/mmap: start distinguishing if vma can be removed in mergeability test Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-15 22:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-16 10:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm/mremap: simplify vma expansion again Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-15 22:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-16 8:35 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-20 14:16 ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230320141621.fm3iwh7khjhji6zc@revolver \
--to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maple-tree@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox