From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tkhai@ya.ru, vbabka@suse.cz,
christian.koenig@amd.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
shakeelb@google.com, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, david@redhat.com, shy828301@gmail.com
Cc: sultan@kerneltoast.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, paulmck@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/8] mm: vmscan: add a map_nr_max field to shrinker_info
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:28:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230313112819.38938-2-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230313112819.38938-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To prepare for the subsequent lockless memcg slab shrink,
add a map_nr_max field to struct shrinker_info to records
its own real shrinker_nr_max.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Suggested-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 1 +
mm/vmscan.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index b6eda2ab205d..aa69ea98e2d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct shrinker_info {
struct rcu_head rcu;
atomic_long_t *nr_deferred;
unsigned long *map;
+ int map_nr_max;
};
struct lruvec_stats_percpu {
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 9414226218f0..9a2a6301052c 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int map_size, int defer_size,
- int old_map_size, int old_defer_size)
+ int old_map_size, int old_defer_size,
+ int new_nr_max)
{
struct shrinker_info *new, *old;
struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
@@ -240,12 +241,17 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
if (!old)
return 0;
+ /* Already expanded this shrinker_info */
+ if (new_nr_max <= old->map_nr_max)
+ continue;
+
new = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(*new) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
if (!new)
return -ENOMEM;
new->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(new + 1);
new->map = (void *)new->nr_deferred + defer_size;
+ new->map_nr_max = new_nr_max;
/* map: set all old bits, clear all new bits */
memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_map_size);
@@ -295,6 +301,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
}
info->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(info + 1);
info->map = (void *)info->nr_deferred + defer_size;
+ info->map_nr_max = shrinker_nr_max;
rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, info);
}
up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
@@ -302,23 +309,14 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
return ret;
}
-static inline bool need_expand(int nr_max)
-{
- return round_up(nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) >
- round_up(shrinker_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG);
-}
-
static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
{
int ret = 0;
- int new_nr_max = new_id + 1;
+ int new_nr_max = round_up(new_id + 1, BITS_PER_LONG);
int map_size, defer_size = 0;
int old_map_size, old_defer_size = 0;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
- if (!need_expand(new_nr_max))
- goto out;
-
if (!root_mem_cgroup)
goto out;
@@ -332,7 +330,8 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
do {
ret = expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, map_size, defer_size,
- old_map_size, old_defer_size);
+ old_map_size, old_defer_size,
+ new_nr_max);
if (ret) {
mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
goto out;
@@ -352,9 +351,11 @@ void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id)
rcu_read_lock();
info = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info);
- /* Pairs with smp mb in shrink_slab() */
- smp_mb__before_atomic();
- set_bit(shrinker_id, info->map);
+ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(shrinker_id >= info->map_nr_max)) {
+ /* Pairs with smp mb in shrink_slab() */
+ smp_mb__before_atomic();
+ set_bit(shrinker_id, info->map);
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
}
}
@@ -432,7 +433,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
for_each_node(nid) {
child_info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
parent_info = shrinker_info_protected(parent, nid);
- for (i = 0; i < shrinker_nr_max; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < child_info->map_nr_max; i++) {
nr = atomic_long_read(&child_info->nr_deferred[i]);
atomic_long_add(nr, &parent_info->nr_deferred[i]);
}
@@ -899,7 +900,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
if (unlikely(!info))
goto unlock;
- for_each_set_bit(i, info->map, shrinker_nr_max) {
+ for_each_set_bit(i, info->map, info->map_nr_max) {
struct shrink_control sc = {
.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
.nid = nid,
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-13 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-13 11:28 [PATCH v5 0/8] make slab shrink lockless Qi Zheng
2023-03-13 11:28 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2023-03-13 20:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] mm: vmscan: add a map_nr_max field to shrinker_info Kirill Tkhai
2023-03-15 2:49 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-03-13 11:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] mm: vmscan: make global slab shrink lockless Qi Zheng
2023-03-13 11:28 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] mm: vmscan: make memcg " Qi Zheng
2023-03-13 11:28 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] mm: vmscan: add shrinker_srcu_generation Qi Zheng
2023-03-13 11:28 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] mm: shrinkers: make count and scan in shrinker debugfs lockless Qi Zheng
2023-03-13 11:28 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] mm: vmscan: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred Qi Zheng
2023-03-13 11:28 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] mm: vmscan: remove shrinker_rwsem from synchronize_shrinkers() Qi Zheng
2023-03-13 11:28 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] mm: shrinkers: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230313112819.38938-2-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=sultan@kerneltoast.com \
--cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox