From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52A8C64EC4 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 274746B0078; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 02:00:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 221F56B007B; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 02:00:55 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0E9E66B007D; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 02:00:55 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F229D6B0078 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 02:00:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02A31A048E for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:00:54 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80552091228.22.195C66A Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C191C0024 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=none (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de has no SPF policy when checking 213.95.11.211) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1678431653; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=73jxqyjcY6w6G/ScpoxAhlz5HEcLwkXQJj1AvU9zBG8=; b=IufjsH0ASRe39u9AceeiAL1APfraYfv1ypoAV3PpFJjZcUrFIxAwpeguaHMz5ZlPqoQzvy gOD0tkrqZp0AsuH/1tLbzxwkv7BaDF8zM5sD2nVkrkG1Px/sI8QkxzmipTPLx4tmSMl1Rw L5EzRlDrS5KkCfKc4bI0g7HNiktU1Es= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=none (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de has no SPF policy when checking 213.95.11.211) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1678431653; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=OFxHJOl8B0EDVLKV6EV1lnwmimllgcF59A3ajwXVhpgln+AVkGXuDBMRTd706xp7+YStH7 00MciZ33X8riA67tIAmRFJKi0PFONH13K7t7DC/tONWHDERB9lXnUp9p13HrceCaPs0BGT viWU92CbYvqwTbKM1EuDNUvhXRP4ri8= Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4F89A68AFE; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:00:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:00:47 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Al Viro Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , Joseph Qi , Evgeniy Dushistov , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ufs: don't flush page immediately for DIRSYNC directories Message-ID: <20230310070047.GB13563@lst.de> References: <20230307143125.27778-1-hch@lst.de> <20230307143125.27778-2-hch@lst.de> <20230310035353.GM3390869@ZenIV> <20230310063756.GA13484@lst.de> <20230310065235.GR3390869@ZenIV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230310065235.GR3390869@ZenIV> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Stat-Signature: pffpw8e6r84oij4dpeyyzgf4zd7ki91f X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D0C191C0024 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-HE-Tag: 1678431652-46844 X-HE-Meta: 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 tZJF3Opx TvokIDjRXC/OrGPbGiprGzpK4A9WgU8XRn/Vqj8gRNNoNIC32gH1Pzp0Ab3g5mdQT57Itv4yQpzIucrY= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 06:52:35AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > > Umm... I'll throw it in ufs pile, I guess (tomorrow - I'll need to > > > sort out Fabio's patches in the area as well; IIRC, the latest > > > had been in late December). > > > > Well, the three patches really should go together, otherwise we miss > > yet another merge window. > > Umm... Do you need them in the same (never-rebased?) branch, or would > it suffice to have all of them reach mainline by 6.4-rc1? The latter. But patch 3 depends on 1 and 2.