linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
To: glider@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de,  mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	x86@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,  hpa@zytor.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, elver@google.com,  dvyukov@google.com,
	nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com,
	 kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] kmsan: another take at fixing memcpy tests
Date: Wed,  1 Mar 2023 15:39:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230301143933.2374658-2-glider@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230301143933.2374658-1-glider@google.com>

5478afc55a21 ("kmsan: fix memcpy tests") uses OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR() to
hide the uninitialized var from the compiler optimizations.

However OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(uninit) enforces an immediate check of
@uninit, so memcpy tests did not actually check the behavior of memcpy(),
because they always contained a KMSAN report.

Replace OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR() with a file-local asm macro that just
clobbers the memory, and add a test case for memcpy() that does not
expect an error report.

Also reflow kmsan_test.c with clang-format.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
---
 mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c b/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
index 088e21a48dc4b..cc98a3f4e0899 100644
--- a/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
+++ b/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
@@ -407,6 +407,36 @@ static void test_printk(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
 }
 
+/*
+ * Prevent the compiler from optimizing @var away. Without this, Clang may
+ * notice that @var is uninitialized and drop memcpy() calls that use it.
+ *
+ * There is OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR() in linux/compier.h that we cannot use here,
+ * because it is implemented as inline assembly receiving @var as a parameter
+ * and will enforce a KMSAN check.
+ */
+#define DO_NOT_OPTIMIZE(var) asm("" ::: "memory")
+
+/*
+ * Test case: ensure that memcpy() correctly copies initialized values.
+ */
+static void test_init_memcpy(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	EXPECTATION_NO_REPORT(expect);
+	volatile int src;
+	volatile int dst = 0;
+
+	// Ensure DO_NOT_OPTIMIZE() does not cause extra checks.
+	DO_NOT_OPTIMIZE(src);
+	src = 1;
+	kunit_info(
+		test,
+		"memcpy()ing aligned initialized src to aligned dst (no reports)\n");
+	memcpy((void *)&dst, (void *)&src, sizeof(src));
+	kmsan_check_memory((void *)&dst, sizeof(dst));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
+}
+
 /*
  * Test case: ensure that memcpy() correctly copies uninitialized values between
  * aligned `src` and `dst`.
@@ -420,7 +450,7 @@ static void test_memcpy_aligned_to_aligned(struct kunit *test)
 	kunit_info(
 		test,
 		"memcpy()ing aligned uninit src to aligned dst (UMR report)\n");
-	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(uninit_src);
+	DO_NOT_OPTIMIZE(uninit_src);
 	memcpy((void *)&dst, (void *)&uninit_src, sizeof(uninit_src));
 	kmsan_check_memory((void *)&dst, sizeof(dst));
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
@@ -443,7 +473,7 @@ static void test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned(struct kunit *test)
 	kunit_info(
 		test,
 		"memcpy()ing aligned uninit src to unaligned dst (UMR report)\n");
-	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(uninit_src);
+	DO_NOT_OPTIMIZE(uninit_src);
 	memcpy((void *)&dst[1], (void *)&uninit_src, sizeof(uninit_src));
 	kmsan_check_memory((void *)dst, 4);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
@@ -467,13 +497,14 @@ static void test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned2(struct kunit *test)
 	kunit_info(
 		test,
 		"memcpy()ing aligned uninit src to unaligned dst - part 2 (UMR report)\n");
-	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(uninit_src);
+	DO_NOT_OPTIMIZE(uninit_src);
 	memcpy((void *)&dst[1], (void *)&uninit_src, sizeof(uninit_src));
 	kmsan_check_memory((void *)&dst[4], sizeof(uninit_src));
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
 }
 
-static noinline void fibonacci(int *array, int size, int start) {
+static noinline void fibonacci(int *array, int size, int start)
+{
 	if (start < 2 || (start == size))
 		return;
 	array[start] = array[start - 1] + array[start - 2];
@@ -482,8 +513,7 @@ static noinline void fibonacci(int *array, int size, int start) {
 
 static void test_long_origin_chain(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	EXPECTATION_UNINIT_VALUE_FN(expect,
-				    "test_long_origin_chain");
+	EXPECTATION_UNINIT_VALUE_FN(expect, "test_long_origin_chain");
 	/* (KMSAN_MAX_ORIGIN_DEPTH * 2) recursive calls to fibonacci(). */
 	volatile int accum[KMSAN_MAX_ORIGIN_DEPTH * 2 + 2];
 	int last = ARRAY_SIZE(accum) - 1;
@@ -515,6 +545,7 @@ static struct kunit_case kmsan_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(test_uaf),
 	KUNIT_CASE(test_percpu_propagate),
 	KUNIT_CASE(test_printk),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_init_memcpy),
 	KUNIT_CASE(test_memcpy_aligned_to_aligned),
 	KUNIT_CASE(test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned),
 	KUNIT_CASE(test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned2),
-- 
2.39.2.722.g9855ee24e9-goog



  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-01 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-01 14:39 [PATCH 1/4] x86: kmsan: Don't rename memintrinsics in uninstrumented files Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-01 14:39 ` Alexander Potapenko [this message]
2023-03-02 11:18   ` [PATCH 2/4] kmsan: another take at fixing memcpy tests Marco Elver
2023-03-02 14:48     ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-01 14:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: kmsan: use C versions of memset16/memset32/memset64 Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-02 11:18   ` Marco Elver
2023-03-01 14:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] kmsan: add memsetXX tests Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-02 11:22   ` Marco Elver
2023-03-02 14:14     ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: kmsan: Don't rename memintrinsics in uninstrumented files Marco Elver
2023-03-02 14:27   ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-02 15:13     ` Marco Elver
2023-03-02 15:17       ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-03 14:14 Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-03 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] kmsan: another take at fixing memcpy tests Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-03 14:17   ` Alexander Potapenko
2023-03-03 14:59   ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230301143933.2374658-2-glider@google.com \
    --to=glider@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox