linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@shopee.com>
To: longman@redhat.com
Cc: lizefan.x@bytedance.com, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@shopee.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpuset: Clean up cpuset_node_allowed
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:35:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230228083537.102665-1-haifeng.xu@shopee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9953284e-05da-56b0-047d-ecf18aa53892@redhat.com>

Commit 002f290627c2 ("cpuset: use static key better and convert to new API")
has used __cpuset_node_allowed() instead of cpuset_node_allowed() to check
whether we can allocate on a memory node. Now this function isn't used by
anyone, so we can do the follow things to clean up it.

1. remove unused codes
2. rename __cpuset_node_allowed() to cpuset_node_allowed()
3. update comments in mm/page_alloc.c

Suggested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@shopee.com>
---
 include/linux/cpuset.h | 16 ++--------------
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c |  4 ++--
 mm/page_alloc.c        |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index d58e0476ee8e..980b76a1237e 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -80,18 +80,11 @@ extern nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p);
 void cpuset_init_current_mems_allowed(void);
 int cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed(nodemask_t *nodemask);
 
-extern bool __cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask);
-
-static inline bool cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
-{
-	if (cpusets_enabled())
-		return __cpuset_node_allowed(node, gfp_mask);
-	return true;
-}
+extern bool cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask);
 
 static inline bool __cpuset_zone_allowed(struct zone *z, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
-	return __cpuset_node_allowed(zone_to_nid(z), gfp_mask);
+	return cpuset_node_allowed(zone_to_nid(z), gfp_mask);
 }
 
 static inline bool cpuset_zone_allowed(struct zone *z, gfp_t gfp_mask)
@@ -223,11 +216,6 @@ static inline int cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed(nodemask_t *nodemask)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static inline bool cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
-{
-	return true;
-}
-
 static inline bool __cpuset_zone_allowed(struct zone *z, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	return true;
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 636f1c682ac0..0241b07d6f21 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -3831,7 +3831,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs)
 }
 
 /*
- * __cpuset_node_allowed - Can we allocate on a memory node?
+ * cpuset_node_allowed - Can we allocate on a memory node?
  * @node: is this an allowed node?
  * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags
  *
@@ -3870,7 +3870,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs)
  *	GFP_KERNEL   - any node in enclosing hardwalled cpuset ok
  *	GFP_USER     - only nodes in current tasks mems allowed ok.
  */
-bool __cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+bool cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	struct cpuset *cs;		/* current cpuset ancestors */
 	bool allowed;			/* is allocation in zone z allowed? */
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 3bb3484563ed..0d170ae590d8 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4175,7 +4175,7 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
 retry:
 	/*
 	 * Scan zonelist, looking for a zone with enough free.
-	 * See also __cpuset_node_allowed() comment in kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c.
+	 * See also cpuset_node_allowed() comment in kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c.
 	 */
 	no_fallback = alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT;
 	z = ac->preferred_zoneref;
@@ -4843,7 +4843,7 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 			alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
 		/*
 		 * Ignore cpuset mems for GFP_ATOMIC rather than fail, see the
-		 * comment for __cpuset_node_allowed().
+		 * comment for cpuset_node_allowed().
 		 */
 		alloc_flags &= ~ALLOC_CPUSET;
 	} else if (unlikely(rt_task(current)) && in_task())
-- 
2.25.1



       reply	other threads:[~2023-02-28  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <9953284e-05da-56b0-047d-ecf18aa53892@redhat.com>
2023-02-28  8:35 ` Haifeng Xu [this message]
2023-03-17 21:37   ` Tejun Heo
2023-03-18  1:35   ` Waiman Long
2023-03-18 21:30     ` Waiman Long
2023-03-24  2:03       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230228083537.102665-1-haifeng.xu@shopee.com \
    --to=haifeng.xu@shopee.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox