* Re: [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey [not found] ` <bug-217061-27-Nl8xiZT9yu@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> @ 2023-02-23 20:04 ` Andrew Morton 2023-02-23 20:36 ` Bert Karwatzki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-02-23 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: spasswolf; +Cc: bugzilla-daemon, Liam Howlett, Nadav Amit, linux-mm (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 18:27:37 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217061 > > --- Comment #5 from spasswolf@web.de --- > This fixes the problem for me in next-20230220 > > diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c > index 1d4843c97c2a..f70f9a7b545e 100644 > --- a/mm/mprotect.c > +++ b/mm/mprotect.c > @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long start, size_t > len, > if (error) > break; > > + tmp = prev->vm_end; > nstart = tmp; > prot = reqprot; > } > > Next I'll try to construct a simpler testcase without steam and stellaris. Thanks for figuring this out. Liam, this has been bisected to 2286a6914c776e ("mm: change mprotect_fixup to vma iterator"). Please take a look? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey 2023-02-23 20:04 ` [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey Andrew Morton @ 2023-02-23 20:36 ` Bert Karwatzki 2023-02-23 22:02 ` Liam R. Howlett 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Bert Karwatzki @ 2023-02-23 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: bugzilla-daemon, Liam Howlett, Nadav Amit, linux-mm Am Donnerstag, dem 23.02.2023 um 12:04 -0800 schrieb Andrew Morton: > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via > the > bugzilla web interface). > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 18:27:37 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217061 > > > > --- Comment #5 from spasswolf@web.de --- > > This fixes the problem for me in next-20230220 > > > > diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c > > index 1d4843c97c2a..f70f9a7b545e 100644 > > --- a/mm/mprotect.c > > +++ b/mm/mprotect.c > > @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long > > start, size_t > > len, > > if (error) > > break; > > > > + tmp = prev->vm_end; > > nstart = tmp; > > prot = reqprot; > > } > > > > Next I'll try to construct a simpler testcase without steam and > > stellaris. > > Thanks for figuring this out. > > Liam, this has been bisected to 2286a6914c776e ("mm: change > mprotect_fixup to vma iterator"). Please take a look? > While a still don't have a simple example for this bug I can at least explain what it takes to trigger it: The memory area for which mprotect is called must have (at least) 3 vm_area_struct of which the first to must be mergeable. Then the following happens in the for_each_vma_range loop inside do_mprotect_pkey: At the beggining of the loop vma points to the first vm_area_struct. Then mprotect_fixup is called and merges our first two vm_area_structs but tmp still points to the beginning of the second vm_area_struct. At the beginning of the next iteration vma already points to the third vm_area_struct and so the check vma->vm_start != tmp gives a false error. Setting tmp=prev->vm_end after mprotect fixup sets tmp to the beginning of the next unprocessed vma and fixes this error. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey 2023-02-23 20:36 ` Bert Karwatzki @ 2023-02-23 22:02 ` Liam R. Howlett 2023-03-03 18:29 ` Liam R. Howlett 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2023-02-23 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bert Karwatzki; +Cc: Andrew Morton, bugzilla-daemon, Nadav Amit, linux-mm * Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> [230223 15:36]: > Am Donnerstag, dem 23.02.2023 um 12:04 -0800 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via > > the > > bugzilla web interface). > > > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 18:27:37 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote: > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217061 > > > > > > --- Comment #5 from spasswolf@web.de --- > > > This fixes the problem for me in next-20230220 > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c > > > index 1d4843c97c2a..f70f9a7b545e 100644 > > > --- a/mm/mprotect.c > > > +++ b/mm/mprotect.c > > > @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long > > > start, size_t > > > len, > > > if (error) > > > break; > > > > > > + tmp = prev->vm_end; > > > nstart = tmp; > > > prot = reqprot; > > > } > > > > > > Next I'll try to construct a simpler testcase without steam and > > > stellaris. > > > > Thanks for figuring this out. > > > > Liam, this has been bisected to 2286a6914c776e ("mm: change > > mprotect_fixup to vma iterator"). Please take a look? > > > While a still don't have a simple example for this bug I can at least > explain what it takes to trigger it: > The memory area for which mprotect is called must have (at least) 3 > vm_area_struct of which the first to must be mergeable. Then the > following happens in the for_each_vma_range loop inside > do_mprotect_pkey: > At the beggining of the loop vma points to the first vm_area_struct. > Then mprotect_fixup is called and merges our first two vm_area_structs > but tmp still points to the beginning of the second vm_area_struct. At > the beginning of the next iteration vma already points to the third > vm_area_struct and so the check vma->vm_start != tmp gives a false > error. > Setting tmp=prev->vm_end after mprotect fixup sets tmp to the > beginning of the next unprocessed vma and fixes this error. > Thank you for the analysis. Just for clarity, tmp is used to ensure there isn't a hole in the range we are iterating over. I don't particularly like how this was done, but I tried (unsuccessfully) not to break it. It looks like I've missed the case where a merge succeeds and so tmp is now out of sync with the iterator. I would change this tmp = prev->vm_end idea slightly and use the vma iterator end location: tmp = vma_iter_end(&vmi); I'll send out a patch once I test this. Thanks, Liam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey 2023-02-23 22:02 ` Liam R. Howlett @ 2023-03-03 18:29 ` Liam R. Howlett 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2023-03-03 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bert Karwatzki, Andrew Morton, bugzilla-daemon, Nadav Amit, linux-mm ... > > Just for clarity, tmp is used to ensure there isn't a hole in the range > we are iterating over. I don't particularly like how this was done, but > I tried (unsuccessfully) not to break it. > > It looks like I've missed the case where a merge succeeds and so tmp is > now out of sync with the iterator. > > I would change this tmp = prev->vm_end idea slightly and use the vma > iterator end location: > > tmp = vma_iter_end(&vmi); > > I'll send out a patch once I test this. The patch has been sent out and I've submitted my testing to LTP: https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/3cbaaddf6f785d91aeb370beb75d0623f8c48624 The testcase is mprotect05 Thanks, Liam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-03 18:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-217061-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
[not found] ` <bug-217061-27-Nl8xiZT9yu@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2023-02-23 20:04 ` [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey Andrew Morton
2023-02-23 20:36 ` Bert Karwatzki
2023-02-23 22:02 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-03-03 18:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox