* Re: [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey
[not found] ` <bug-217061-27-Nl8xiZT9yu@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2023-02-23 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2023-02-23 20:36 ` Bert Karwatzki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-02-23 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: spasswolf; +Cc: bugzilla-daemon, Liam Howlett, Nadav Amit, linux-mm
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 18:27:37 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217061
>
> --- Comment #5 from spasswolf@web.de ---
> This fixes the problem for me in next-20230220
>
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index 1d4843c97c2a..f70f9a7b545e 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long start, size_t
> len,
> if (error)
> break;
>
> + tmp = prev->vm_end;
> nstart = tmp;
> prot = reqprot;
> }
>
> Next I'll try to construct a simpler testcase without steam and stellaris.
Thanks for figuring this out.
Liam, this has been bisected to 2286a6914c776e ("mm: change
mprotect_fixup to vma iterator"). Please take a look?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey
2023-02-23 20:04 ` [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey Andrew Morton
@ 2023-02-23 20:36 ` Bert Karwatzki
2023-02-23 22:02 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bert Karwatzki @ 2023-02-23 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: bugzilla-daemon, Liam Howlett, Nadav Amit, linux-mm
Am Donnerstag, dem 23.02.2023 um 12:04 -0800 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via
> the
> bugzilla web interface).
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 18:27:37 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote:
>
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217061
> >
> > --- Comment #5 from spasswolf@web.de ---
> > This fixes the problem for me in next-20230220
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> > index 1d4843c97c2a..f70f9a7b545e 100644
> > --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> > +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> > @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long
> > start, size_t
> > len,
> > if (error)
> > break;
> >
> > + tmp = prev->vm_end;
> > nstart = tmp;
> > prot = reqprot;
> > }
> >
> > Next I'll try to construct a simpler testcase without steam and
> > stellaris.
>
> Thanks for figuring this out.
>
> Liam, this has been bisected to 2286a6914c776e ("mm: change
> mprotect_fixup to vma iterator"). Please take a look?
>
While a still don't have a simple example for this bug I can at least
explain what it takes to trigger it:
The memory area for which mprotect is called must have (at least) 3
vm_area_struct of which the first to must be mergeable. Then the
following happens in the for_each_vma_range loop inside
do_mprotect_pkey:
At the beggining of the loop vma points to the first vm_area_struct.
Then mprotect_fixup is called and merges our first two vm_area_structs
but tmp still points to the beginning of the second vm_area_struct. At
the beginning of the next iteration vma already points to the third
vm_area_struct and so the check vma->vm_start != tmp gives a false
error.
Setting tmp=prev->vm_end after mprotect fixup sets tmp to the
beginning of the next unprocessed vma and fixes this error.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey
2023-02-23 20:36 ` Bert Karwatzki
@ 2023-02-23 22:02 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-03-03 18:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2023-02-23 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bert Karwatzki; +Cc: Andrew Morton, bugzilla-daemon, Nadav Amit, linux-mm
* Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> [230223 15:36]:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 23.02.2023 um 12:04 -0800 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via
> > the
> > bugzilla web interface).
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 18:27:37 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217061
> > >
> > > --- Comment #5 from spasswolf@web.de ---
> > > This fixes the problem for me in next-20230220
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> > > index 1d4843c97c2a..f70f9a7b545e 100644
> > > --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> > > +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> > > @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long
> > > start, size_t
> > > len,
> > > if (error)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > + tmp = prev->vm_end;
> > > nstart = tmp;
> > > prot = reqprot;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Next I'll try to construct a simpler testcase without steam and
> > > stellaris.
> >
> > Thanks for figuring this out.
> >
> > Liam, this has been bisected to 2286a6914c776e ("mm: change
> > mprotect_fixup to vma iterator"). Please take a look?
> >
> While a still don't have a simple example for this bug I can at least
> explain what it takes to trigger it:
> The memory area for which mprotect is called must have (at least) 3
> vm_area_struct of which the first to must be mergeable. Then the
> following happens in the for_each_vma_range loop inside
> do_mprotect_pkey:
> At the beggining of the loop vma points to the first vm_area_struct.
> Then mprotect_fixup is called and merges our first two vm_area_structs
> but tmp still points to the beginning of the second vm_area_struct. At
> the beginning of the next iteration vma already points to the third
> vm_area_struct and so the check vma->vm_start != tmp gives a false
> error.
> Setting tmp=prev->vm_end after mprotect fixup sets tmp to the
> beginning of the next unprocessed vma and fixes this error.
>
Thank you for the analysis.
Just for clarity, tmp is used to ensure there isn't a hole in the range
we are iterating over. I don't particularly like how this was done, but
I tried (unsuccessfully) not to break it.
It looks like I've missed the case where a merge succeeds and so tmp is
now out of sync with the iterator.
I would change this tmp = prev->vm_end idea slightly and use the vma
iterator end location:
tmp = vma_iter_end(&vmi);
I'll send out a patch once I test this.
Thanks,
Liam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey
2023-02-23 22:02 ` Liam R. Howlett
@ 2023-03-03 18:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2023-03-03 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bert Karwatzki, Andrew Morton, bugzilla-daemon, Nadav Amit, linux-mm
...
>
> Just for clarity, tmp is used to ensure there isn't a hole in the range
> we are iterating over. I don't particularly like how this was done, but
> I tried (unsuccessfully) not to break it.
>
> It looks like I've missed the case where a merge succeeds and so tmp is
> now out of sync with the iterator.
>
> I would change this tmp = prev->vm_end idea slightly and use the vma
> iterator end location:
>
> tmp = vma_iter_end(&vmi);
>
> I'll send out a patch once I test this.
The patch has been sent out and I've submitted my testing to LTP:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/3cbaaddf6f785d91aeb370beb75d0623f8c48624
The testcase is mprotect05
Thanks,
Liam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-03 18:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-217061-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
[not found] ` <bug-217061-27-Nl8xiZT9yu@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2023-02-23 20:04 ` [Bug 217061] commit 2286a6914c776ec34cd97e4573b1466d055cb9de breaks do_mprotect_pkey Andrew Morton
2023-02-23 20:36 ` Bert Karwatzki
2023-02-23 22:02 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-03-03 18:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox