From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74888C05027 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 04:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DB2426B0073; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 23:54:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D630F6B0075; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 23:54:21 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C2AF66B0078; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 23:54:21 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EE66B0073 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 23:54:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D7F120BF6 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 04:54:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80421135522.21.9888A63 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143C8140011 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 04:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=GUisuDBH; spf=pass (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 134.134.136.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1675313659; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=Woj9bYBUWqcY5OH8HdcHP038dEE4hdiBsImcdWz+z8o=; b=VJxVLmtTj32KV7JsB3xf8rFtgoCPYDqmzpIn0L+vqtS4hcb45phgm8PcQVua9deiJbid3V /RtyfXPp6yVlrC3Pz+uSimaxtOH8tHIYX32d2nkn+zPczdog+iLTnPR0gEjY7rj6K05hZw Sj+8xTZucaJjMqyOAvTgqSjCyOjhzPk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=GUisuDBH; spf=pass (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 134.134.136.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1675313659; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Oh01VvNiyfaPa14l0NzdX3vGxRNvNtneoa8yzt7j1qipRRU2O6NbQT4BQCj28UQeCc8tkn ksJHb5U92jS20jvmeVO7iuDWDISZi2xIC8eki27GtVFKezf5crvKspWgjdYQBVhBBNZ53q diKp3/X48e1lQuAUVgP7npSv7TVsokA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1675313659; x=1706849659; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=RxuR55X3AAe0WSdLaoBJfLJjrnmzU1QVMffDdTPAznE=; b=GUisuDBHGEe3Evdd8HXbfxuPJrNzF8KOK6DtLjR8Xgtkg71eWp1r4xmN cHCexMousOIZGLYMLn46C8sPhY/pRNUYG5GPzlCVnUzVvP2sMtegAXKWs wZz67R+eyLH3gK49qDdQ90/R2XvwJ9S2/ZzlpiayH2tG9KPSkWHSPJOzI AKu9LTHlqsM/t5Fj321a8fHelaKogSkvdFUKtEWF+emnIxF/YWg9xNbvW sACKjh5JZ7e+APXv27MnkgZste3B9fTNj+FTAWQFtvTPPldCdYjql5HqE z5XPrlJslSI59a+n3Bi4bQzq5zUCkGu8jD8WPCtvbkXfyrtC5TlJTJVnJ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="390741306" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,266,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="390741306" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2023 20:54:17 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="658584547" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,266,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="658584547" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO ffa7f14d1d0f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2023 20:54:10 -0800 Received: from kbuild by ffa7f14d1d0f with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pNRbu-0006AE-0N; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 04:54:10 +0000 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 12:53:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Yafang Shao , ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, vbabka@suse.cz, urezki@gmail.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Yafang Shao Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpf: introduce bpf_mem_alloc_size() Message-ID: <202302021258.By6JZK71-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230202014158.19616-7-laoar.shao@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230202014158.19616-7-laoar.shao@gmail.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 143C8140011 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: 5pnboni1y7cww68ch7e79oknzwz9y4rg X-HE-Tag: 1675313658-595252 X-HE-Meta: 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 49uYYT5d 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Yafang, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yafang-Shao/mm-percpu-fix-incorrect-size-in-pcpu_obj_full_size/20230202-094352 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230202014158.19616-7-laoar.shao%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpf: introduce bpf_mem_alloc_size() config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230202/202302021258.By6JZK71-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/996f3e2ac4dca054396d0f37ffe8ddb97fc4212f git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Yafang-Shao/mm-percpu-fix-incorrect-size-in-pcpu_obj_full_size/20230202-094352 git checkout 996f3e2ac4dca054396d0f37ffe8ddb97fc4212f # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=m68k olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=m68k SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/bpf/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:227:15: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_mem_cache_size' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 227 | unsigned long bpf_mem_cache_size(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/bpf_mem_cache_size +227 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c 226 > 227 unsigned long bpf_mem_cache_size(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj) 228 { 229 unsigned long size; 230 231 if (!obj) 232 return 0; 233 234 if (c->percpu_size) { 235 size = percpu_size(((void **)obj)[1]); 236 size += ksize(obj); 237 return size; 238 } 239 240 return ksize(obj); 241 } 242 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests