From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm/page_alloc: Explicitly record high-order atomic allocations in alloc_flags
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 11:45:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230104114502.j4hzzjohxk7bdkcj@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <915a5034-53e6-9464-3fc7-4d1b5a0aa26d@suse.cz>
First off, sorry for the long delay getting back to you. I was sick for
a few weeks and still catching up. I'm still not 100%.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:51:11PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/29/22 16:16, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index da746e9eb2cf..e2b65767dda0 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -3710,7 +3710,7 @@ struct page *rmqueue_buddy(struct zone *preferred_zone, struct zone *zone,
> > * reserved for high-order atomic allocation, so order-0
> > * request should skip it.
> > */
> > - if (order > 0 && alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER)
> > + if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC)
> > page = __rmqueue_smallest(zone, order, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC);
> > if (!page) {
> > page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype, alloc_flags);
> > @@ -4028,8 +4028,10 @@ bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, unsigned long mark,
> > return true;
> > }
> > #endif
> > - if (alloc_harder && !free_area_empty(area, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC))
> > + if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC) &&
> > + !free_area_empty(area, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC)) {
> > return true;
>
> alloc_harder is defined as
> (alloc_flags & (ALLOC_HARDER|ALLOC_OOM));
> AFAICS this means we no longer allow ALLOC_OOM to use the highatomic
> reserve. Isn't that a risk?
>
Yes, it is. I intend to apply the patch below on top. I didn't alter the
first check for ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC as I wanted OOM handling to only use the
high-order reserves if there was no other option. While this is a change
in behaviour, it should be a harmless one. I'll add a note in the changelog.
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 50fc1e7cb154..0ef4f3236a5a 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3710,6 +3710,16 @@ struct page *rmqueue_buddy(struct zone *preferred_zone, struct zone *zone,
page = __rmqueue_smallest(zone, order, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC);
if (!page) {
page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype, alloc_flags);
+
+ /*
+ * If the allocation fails, allow OOM handling access
+ * to HIGHATOMIC reserves as failing now is worse than
+ * failing a high-order atomic allocation in the
+ * future.
+ */
+ if (!page && (alloc_flags & ALLOC_OOM))
+ page = __rmqueue_smallest(zone, order, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC);
+
if (!page) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
return NULL;
@@ -4023,7 +4033,7 @@ bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, unsigned long mark,
return true;
}
#endif
- if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC) &&
+ if ((alloc_flags & (ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC|ALLOC_OOM)) &&
!free_area_empty(area, MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC)) {
return true;
}
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 15:16 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Discard __GFP_ATOMIC Mel Gorman
2022-11-29 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/page_alloc: Rename ALLOC_HIGH to ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE Mel Gorman
2022-12-08 16:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-29 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/page_alloc: Treat RT tasks similar to GFP_HIGH Mel Gorman
2022-12-08 16:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-29 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/page_alloc: Explicitly record high-order atomic allocations in alloc_flags Mel Gorman
2022-12-05 5:17 ` NeilBrown
2022-12-05 10:27 ` Mel Gorman
2022-12-08 16:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-04 11:45 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2022-11-29 15:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: Explicitly define what alloc flags deplete min reserves Mel Gorman
2022-12-08 17:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-04 12:02 ` Mel Gorman
2022-11-29 15:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/page_alloc: Give GFP_ATOMIC and non-blocking allocations access to reserves Mel Gorman
2022-12-08 18:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-04 12:03 ` Mel Gorman
2022-11-29 15:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: discard __GFP_ATOMIC Mel Gorman
2022-12-08 18:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-04 12:04 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-05 13:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-01-05 21:53 ` NeilBrown
2023-01-06 9:35 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-08 9:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-01-13 11:12 [PATCH 0/6 v3] Discard __GFP_ATOMIC Mel Gorman
2023-01-13 11:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/page_alloc: Explicitly record high-order atomic allocations in alloc_flags Mel Gorman
2023-01-13 13:02 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230104114502.j4hzzjohxk7bdkcj@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox