linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>, Jason Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmap: Fix do_brk_flags() modifying obviously incorrect VMAs
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 12:32:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221205123250.3fc552d96fcca5dc58be8443@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221205192304.1957418-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>

On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:23:17 +0000 Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com> wrote:

> Add more sanity checks to the VMA that do_brk_flags() will expand.
> Ensure the VMA matches basic merge requirements within the function
> before calling can_vma_merge_after().

I't unclear what's actually being fixed here.

Why do you feel we need the above changes?

> Drop the duplicate checks from vm_brk_flags() since they will be
> enforced later.
> 
> Fixes: 2e7ce7d354f2 ("mm/mmap: change do_brk_flags() to expand existing VMA and add do_brk_munmap()")

Fixes in what way?  Removing the duplicate checks?


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-05 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-05 19:23 Liam Howlett
2022-12-05 20:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2022-12-05 21:55   ` Jann Horn
2022-12-05 22:13     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-12-05 22:22       ` Jann Horn
2022-12-05 22:26       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-12-06 17:12         ` Liam Howlett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221205123250.3fc552d96fcca5dc58be8443@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox