From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+8c7a4ca1cc31b7ce7070@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@lst.de,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in iov_iter_revert (3)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 17:08:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221129090831.6281-1-hdanton@sina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4WE08+n1sZvSt4M@ZenIV>
On 29 Nov 2022 04:04:35 +0000 Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 02:57:49PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> > syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
>
> [snip]
>
> > syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=17219fbb880000
>
> "syz_mount_image$ntfs3(" followed by arseloads of garbage. And the thing
> conspiciously missing? Why, any ntfs3 maintainers in Cc... Or lists,
> for that matter...
>
> > generic_file_read_iter+0x3d4/0x540 mm/filemap.c:2804
> > do_iter_read+0x6e3/0xc10 fs/read_write.c:796
> > vfs_readv fs/read_write.c:916 [inline]
> > do_preadv+0x1f4/0x330 fs/read_write.c:1008
> > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> > do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> At a guess - something's screwed in ntfs3 ->direct_IO() (return value, most
> likely).
2798 retval = mapping->a_ops->direct_IO(iocb, iter);
2799 if (retval >= 0) {
2800 iocb->ki_pos += retval;
2801 count -= retval;
2802 }
2803 if (retval != -EIOCBQUEUED)
2804 iov_iter_revert(iter, count - iov_iter_count(iter));
2805
2806 /*
2807 * Btrfs can have a short DIO read if we encounter
2808 * compressed extents, so if there was an error, or if
2809 * we've already read everything we wanted to, or if
2810 * there was a short read because we hit EOF, go ahead
2811 * and return. Otherwise fallthrough to buffered io for
2812 * the rest of the read. Buffered reads will not work for
2813 * DAX files, so don't bother trying.
2814 */
2815 if (retval < 0 || !count || IS_DAX(inode))
2816 return retval;
2817 if (iocb->ki_pos >= i_size_read(inode))
2818 return retval;
If ntfs3 is supposed to do nothing wrong with retval set to 5, why is
iov_iter_revert() invoked? Is it correct to check -EIOCBQUEUED only if
the direct_IO callback returns error?
Hillf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 13:37 syzbot
2022-11-26 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
2022-11-28 22:57 ` syzbot
2022-11-29 4:04 ` Al Viro
2022-11-29 9:08 ` Hillf Danton [this message]
2022-11-29 12:20 ` Al Viro
2022-11-29 13:16 ` Al Viro
2022-11-29 15:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221129090831.6281-1-hdanton@sina.com \
--to=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=syzbot+8c7a4ca1cc31b7ce7070@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox