From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Cc: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
sam@gentoo.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] binfmt_elf: Allow .bss in any interp PT_LOAD
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:13:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202211111211.93ED8B4B@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221111074234.xm5a6ota7ppdsto5@google.com>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:42:34PM -0800, Fangrui Song wrote:
> (+ sam@gentoo.org from Pedro Falcato's patch)
>
> On 2022-11-10, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Traditionally, only the final PT_LOAD for load_elf_interp() supported
> > having p_memsz > p_filesz. Recently, lld's construction of musl's
> > libc.so on PowerPC64 started having two PT_LOAD program headers with
> > p_memsz > p_filesz.
> >
> > As the least invasive change possible, check for p_memsz > p_filesz for
> > each PT_LOAD in load_elf_interp.
> >
> > Reported-by: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
> > Link: https://maskray.me/blog/2022-11-05-lld-musl-powerpc64
> > Cc: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
> > Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > v2: I realized we need to retain the final padding call.
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/20221111055747.never.202-kees@kernel.org/
> > ---
> > fs/binfmt_elf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> > index 528e2ac8931f..0a24bbbef1d6 100644
> > --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> > +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> > @@ -673,15 +673,25 @@ static unsigned long load_elf_interp(struct elfhdr *interp_elf_ex,
> > last_bss = k;
> > bss_prot = elf_prot;
> > }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Clear any p_memsz > p_filesz area up to the end
> > + * of the page to wipe anything left over from the
> > + * loaded file contents.
> > + */
> > + if (last_bss > elf_bss && padzero(elf_bss))
>
> Missing {
>
> But after fixing this, I get a musl ld.so error.
>
> > + error = -EFAULT;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - * Now fill out the bss section: first pad the last page from
> > - * the file up to the page boundary, and zero it from elf_bss
> > - * up to the end of the page.
> > + * Finally, pad the last page from the file up to the page boundary,
> > + * and zero it from elf_bss up to the end of the page, if this did
> > + * not already happen with the last PT_LOAD.
> > */
> > - if (padzero(elf_bss)) {
> > + if (last_bss == elf_bss && padzero(elf_bss)) {
> > error = -EFAULT;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> I added a new section to https://maskray.me/blog/2022-11-05-lld-musl-powerpc64
> Copying here:
>
> To test that the kernel ELF loader can handle more RW `PT_LOAD` program headers, we can create an executable with more RW `PT_LOAD` program headers with `p_filesz < p_memsz`.
> We can place a read-only section after `.bss` followed by a `SHT_NOBITS` `SHF_ALLOC|SHF_WRITE` section. The read-only section will form a read-only `PT_LOAD` while the RW section will form a RW `PT_LOAD`.
>
> ```text
> #--- a.c
> #include <assert.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> extern const char toc[];
> char nobits0[0] __attribute__((section(".nobits0")));
> char nobits1[0] __attribute__((section(".nobits1")));
>
> int main(void) {
> assert(toc[4096-1] == 0);
> for (int i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
> assert(nobits0[i] == 0);
> nobits0[0] = nobits0[1024-1] = 1;
> for (int i = 0; i < 4096; i++)
> assert(nobits1[i] == 0);
> nobits1[0] = nobits1[4096-1] = 1;
>
> puts("hello");
> }
>
> #--- toc.s
> .section .toc,"aw",@nobits
> .globl toc
> toc:
> .space 4096
>
> .section .ro0,"a"; .byte 255
> .section .nobits0,"aw",@nobits; .space 1024
> .section .ro1,"a"; .byte 255
> .section .nobits1,"aw",@nobits; .space 4096
>
> #--- a.lds
> SECTIONS { .ro0 : {} .nobits0 : {} .ro1 : {} .nobits1 : {} } INSERT AFTER .bss;
> ```
>
> ```sh
> split-file a.txt a
> path/to/musl-gcc -Wl,--dynamic-linker=/lib/libc.so a/a.c a/a.lds -o toy
> ```
>
> split-file is a utility in llvm-project.
Where is a.txt? Also, it'd be nice to have this without needing the
musl-gcc.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-11 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221111061315.gonna.703-kees@kernel.org>
2022-11-11 7:42 ` Fangrui Song
2022-11-11 20:13 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-11-11 20:27 ` Fangrui Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202211111211.93ED8B4B@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=pedro.falcato@gmail.com \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox