From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0CCC433FE for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 29F5B6B0071; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 01:56:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 228676B0073; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 01:56:26 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0C9366B0074; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 01:56:26 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F337A6B0071 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 01:56:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA55161038 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:56:25 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80109366330.05.909FD2B Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1081EC0004 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 3134267373; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 07:56:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 07:56:18 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: John Hubbard Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Logan Gunthorpe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dan Williams , Jason Gunthorpe , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Don Dutile , Matthew Wilcox , Daniel Vetter , Minturn Dave B , Jason Ekstrand , Dave Hansen , Xiong Jianxin , Bjorn Helgaas , Ira Weiny , Robin Murphy , Martin Oliveira , Chaitanya Kulkarni , Ralph Campbell , Stephen Bates , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Userspace P2PDMA with O_DIRECT NVMe devices Message-ID: <20221108065618.GA20283@lst.de> References: <20221021174116.7200-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20221024150320.GA26731@lst.de> <743ad0e5-6936-9287-d093-2ce1c2a3e32d@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <743ad0e5-6936-9287-d093-2ce1c2a3e32d@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1667890585; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=04cDxFqhitHLpToNM/Ds7Kxi73as3g6uKjQ7kPNIssE=; b=zX0qTYgX5gn4r8FG4zwpHXuGgyqPeUT4VOpwsPj/Cinq8VnQ/CkAcyFX+0jMR1MpUoUhvw wP22cZuBopYoxxLtoviRUWZ3gLxsCJ/41N0Kaw1lhiRY1NFwk9WEAeMMmwbM8aH3eKq7P+ 6R7r5IgOVuNGKjYdwPNdwCm4sJA6XKA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=none (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de has no SPF policy when checking 213.95.11.211) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1667890585; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=eLt6dsUQi0ujJ8mK7ImavkssOWUQfWcwNt288jHXtYpb7V15X7QNxlmUIiM2juIQUQMydJ PCVZJyCPjXICwjXjbaP6voLL+QiDscjBGb6lhZTOFpqbsoovze7FXzz5KPaklCu4UivAFd gaXx3kCaRxo+AWoKo5JoQDwovOGwpNc= X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: xm9nkgg7u1y176tgiwqtpb9w65ezo3ia X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1081EC0004 Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=none (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de has no SPF policy when checking 213.95.11.211) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-HE-Tag: 1667890584-689665 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:15:56PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > A little earlier, Jens graciously offered [1] to provide a topic branch, > such as: > > for-6.2/block-gup [2] > > (I've moved the name forward from 6.1 to 6.2, because that discussion > was 7 weeks ago.) So what are we going to do with this series? It would be sad to miss the merge window again.