From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] string: Add __realloc_size hint to kmemdup()
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 12:40:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202211021240.4A97FDE0@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0289429-8779-643a-07da-3cda83c8ca9d@prevas.dk>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 10:26:40AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 01/11/2022 23.33, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Add __realloc_size() hint to kmemdup() so the compiler can reason about
> > the length of the returned buffer. (These must not use __alloc_size,
> > since those include __malloc which says the contents aren't defined[1]).
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/d199c2af-06af-8a50-a6a1-00eefa0b67b4@prevas.dk/
> >
>
> > extern char *kstrndup(const char *s, size_t len, gfp_t gfp);
> > -extern void *kmemdup(const void *src, size_t len, gfp_t gfp) __alloc_size(2);
> > +extern void *kmemdup(const void *src, size_t len, gfp_t gfp) __realloc_size(2);
>
> What tree is this based on? I see that kmemdup() has grown that bogus
> __alloc_size in next-20221101, but in next-20221102 this commit seems to
> DTRT, namely
>
> -extern void *kmemdup(const void *src, size_t len, gfp_t gfp);
> +extern void *kmemdup(const void *src, size_t len, gfp_t gfp)
> __realloc_size(2);
>
> (i.e. there should never be an intermediate commit where kmemdup has
> __alloc_size()).
Right -- I fixed in in my -next tree to not use __alloc_size.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-01 22:33 [PATCH 0/6] slab: Provide full coverage for __alloc_size attribute Kees Cook
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] slab: Clean up SLOB vs kmalloc() definition Kees Cook
2022-11-03 13:32 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] slab: Remove special-casing of const 0 size allocations Kees Cook
2022-11-03 14:00 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] slab: Provide functional __alloc_size() hints to kmalloc_trace*() Kees Cook
2022-11-03 14:16 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-04 18:22 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-05 1:09 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-05 6:45 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] string: Add __realloc_size hint to kmemdup() Kees Cook
2022-11-02 9:26 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-11-02 19:40 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] driver core: Add __alloc_size hint to devm allocators Kees Cook
2023-02-01 7:36 ` Yongqin Liu
2023-02-01 8:11 ` John Stultz
2023-02-01 8:16 ` John Stultz
2023-02-01 18:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-02-02 17:18 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-02 18:56 ` John Stultz
2023-02-02 19:10 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-02 19:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-02 19:31 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-02-02 19:49 ` Sami Tolvanen
2023-02-02 19:53 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-02 20:11 ` Sami Tolvanen
2023-02-02 20:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] kunit/fortify: Validate __alloc_size attribute results Kees Cook
2022-11-29 12:24 ` [PATCH 0/6] slab: Provide full coverage for __alloc_size attribute Conor Dooley
2022-11-29 12:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-12-01 17:15 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202211021240.4A97FDE0@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox