From: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221031050006.GA15612@sophie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1666203642.git.remckee0@gmail.com>
Hi Mike,
I noticed that the memblock tree has been updated since I sent this
patch set. Do you want me to send an updated patch set applied on top of
the current tree?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:34:07PM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> These patches add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(). There are two
> sets of tests: range tests and NUMA tests. The range tests use a normal
> (i.e., UMA) simulated physical memory and set the nid to NUMA_NO_NODE. The
> NUMA tests use a simulated physical memory that is set up with multiple
> NUMA nodes. Additionally, most of the NUMA tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
> For the range tests, the TEST_F_EXACT flag is used to run the same set of
> range tests used for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(). The NUMA tests have the
> same setup as the corresponding test for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(), but
> several of the memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests fail to allocate
> memory in setups where the memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test would
> allocate memory. Also, some memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests drop the
> lower limit of the requested range in order to allocate within the
> requested node, but the same setup in a memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test
> allocates within the requested range.
>
> ---
> Changelog
>
> v1 -> v2
> PATCH 0:
> - Add missing memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw to subject line
>
> v2 -> v3
> Based on feedback from David Hildenbrand:
> PATCH 1:
> - alloc_nid_api.c, alloc_nid_api.h, common.h:
> + Add TEST_F_EXACT flag so that tests in alloc_nid_api.c can be run
> with that flag to test memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw()
> - alloc_exact_nid_api.c:
> + Update to run range tests in alloc_nid_api.c with TEST_F_EXACT flag
> instead of using a separate set of tests
> - alloc_nid_api.c:
> + Rename tests and other functions by removing "_try" so that the
> function names are general enough to refer to any of the
> memblock_alloc_*nid*() functions of the memblock API
> ---
>
> Rebecca Mckeever (5):
> memblock tests: introduce range tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
> memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for
> memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
> memblock tests: add bottom-up NUMA tests for
> memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
> memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for
> memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
> memblock tests: remove completed TODO item
>
> tools/testing/memblock/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/testing/memblock/TODO | 7 +-
> tools/testing/memblock/main.c | 2 +
> .../memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c | 1113 +++++++++++++++++
> .../memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h | 25 +
> tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c | 542 ++++----
> tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h | 2 +
> 8 files changed, 1425 insertions(+), 269 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Thanks,
Rebecca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-31 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 18:34 Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] memblock tests: introduce range " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 10:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-03 4:02 ` Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] memblock tests: add top-down NUMA " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 10:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] memblock tests: add bottom-up " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 10:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] memblock tests: add generic " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 12:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] memblock tests: remove completed TODO item Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 5:00 ` Rebecca Mckeever [this message]
2022-10-31 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw Mike Rapoport
2022-10-31 12:43 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221031050006.GA15612@sophie \
--to=remckee0@gmail.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox