linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	"Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: mm/huge_memory: do not clobber swp_entry_t during THP split
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 15:23:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221024142321.f2etddxtqa47bib7@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1596edbb-02ad-6bdf-51b8-15c2d2e08b76@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 02:04:50PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> Hi Mel, mm experts,
> 
> With 6.1-rc2 we started hitting the WARN_ON added in 71e2d666ef85 ("mm/huge_memory: do not clobber swp_entry_t during THP split") in i915 automated CI:
> 

Thanks for the report. As shmem pages pages are allocated via vma_alloc_folio
and are compound pages, can you try the following patch please?  If it
still triggers, please post the new oops as it'll include the tail page
information.

--8<--
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: prep_compound_tail() clear page->private

Although page allocation always clears page->private in the first page
or head page of an allocation, it has never made a point of clearing
page->private in the tails (though 0 is often what is already there).

But now commit 71e2d666ef85 ("mm/huge_memory: do not clobber swp_entry_t
during THP split") issues a warning when page_tail->private is found to
be non-0 (unless it's swapcache).

Change that warning to dump page_tail (which also dumps head), instead
of just the head: so far we have seen dead000000000122, dead000000000003,
dead000000000001 or 0000000000000002 in the raw output for tail private.

We could just delete the warning, but today's consensus appears to want
page->private to be 0, unless there's a good reason for it to be set:
so now clear it in prep_compound_tail() (more general than just for THP;
but not for high order allocation, which makes no pass down the tails).

Fixes: 71e2d666ef85 ("mm/huge_memory: do not clobber swp_entry_t during THP split")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
 mm/page_alloc.c  | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 03fc7e5edf07..561a42567477 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2462,7 +2462,7 @@ static void __split_huge_page_tail(struct page *head, int tail,
 	 * Fix up and warn once if private is unexpectedly set.
 	 */
 	if (!folio_test_swapcache(page_folio(head))) {
-		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(page_tail->private != 0, head);
+		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(page_tail->private != 0, page_tail);
 		page_tail->private = 0;
 	}
 
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index b5a6c815ae28..218b28ee49ed 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -807,6 +807,7 @@ static void prep_compound_tail(struct page *head, int tail_idx)
 
 	p->mapping = TAIL_MAPPING;
 	set_compound_head(p, head);
+	set_page_private(p, 0);
 }
 
 void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
-- 
2.35.3


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-24 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-24 13:04 Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-10-24 14:23 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2022-10-25  8:50   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-10-25 10:03     ` Mel Gorman
2022-10-25 15:26       ` Hugh Dickins
2022-10-26  9:25         ` Mel Gorman
2022-10-26  3:04       ` Andrew Morton
2022-10-26  3:35         ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221024142321.f2etddxtqa47bib7@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox