From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11933C433FE for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8B7996B0071; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 867F36B0073; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:04:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 72FCF6B0074; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:04:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604B56B0071 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 22:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AF0C0290 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:04:58 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80039684676.07.3BEBB7B Received: from mail-pf1-f172.google.com (mail-pf1-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE188A0027 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 02:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f172.google.com with SMTP id h13so18942446pfr.7 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:04:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fromorbit-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=C5913yuT7OHnydXh0goEOs2trFBFfmtyAZq5Ppe1lGY=; b=pmvVYwMRiFmZeRC0NmGKeTj4N79Gml892HE066U9X73Y9FIWX6zboxQPr1eKe2w/WV Y1aIfzVYl+pp5jGyFgYOnfhGjMrYXGgFVD8fdHBMeyRLK/ZIUXKh+YO0p8j983BJzO/6 a6zk0OEQ+YRPGv8YG5N0UJ1UIVA3v4qxnXy/GYWHRZZNosKGt6vLWJmgT6Wy7eZJRvg/ ik053gZgGVbtTGPBHqy7XYB1djshu+dPZGyY3xLrt+uTpX5q+nlpXJpg6r5CJtibFxHU Z7IJnMx4v+Ij4vOCOYfvcz+gzv3jlzw5dC6zDGLGziXD4nXOrVK6yk3YN1Hejrpsm9ZY os9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=C5913yuT7OHnydXh0goEOs2trFBFfmtyAZq5Ppe1lGY=; b=2wBjrgTcH/4kprBnN55xy3KEo6CpBSY+SZ5hLwCEKpt484mLRgD0g6ucE5uwpSgviP dATsbf2rWfnZ433ooSIBxWKnAS/rhw9FYsOUzTGUfHWOrzlLOtTY+DGCz9AjQAeox/gC pRoVZ9uUSw2+6TghCUyhNhnVRiA/b5LWnLchCVsnnFPugS8ygE3DX9JWUGfYtxjHaX9Y LBDHFcYFPrd562KdqTnJ/fJDEJsHfy30v2kvQH8eTLY/Yrf7XqlHmzFIKIVzkQeZlq32 VjiDPSpYsGWBw+LcJLAoJKIC8Qgx+tIZRR2VBqEJAxTf1lSH+tImQ1KwQm2qPytjq3mg j1aw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3ITjBAsjsX9VIYj/Yi1LWzB3D0YEzaDS4QgogAO9CQlqe/fAEn aQKlLv0KroBkW/t7WeFYP5A/lw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4cmoMfelOrD/hdUgbMXsDIlPU2dTS9HMqc1PC5PAdmhotT0iN8eOZurGnlx/oTE+Iec5OkMQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:584:0:b0:55a:a7a5:b597 with SMTP id 126-20020a620584000000b0055aa7a5b597mr11672276pff.71.1666231495594; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:04:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dread.disaster.area (pa49-181-106-210.pa.nsw.optusnet.com.au. [49.181.106.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i4-20020a170902e48400b00176c6738d13sm11369139ple.169.2022.10.19.19.04.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dave by dread.disaster.area with local (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1olKvT-00457F-F5; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:04:51 +1100 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:04:51 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Brian Foster Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Zhaoyang Huang , "zhaoyang.huang" , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ke.wang@unisoc.com, steve.kang@unisoc.com, baocong.liu@unisoc.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: move xa forward when run across zombie page Message-ID: <20221020020451.GS2703033@dread.disaster.area> References: <1665725448-31439-1-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com> <20221018223042.GJ2703033@dread.disaster.area> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1666231496; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=uvBmULEYEByC7dwJnr34UAjdlSZ0//Nx0+VTJfis0U150Loj6CTvfjKQ37PAsiGmkW3aG3 NsuJEhITBrvvPxD4KyfF9HmB49lQWsed7Yw8kVlrG60kIzyOIuXhfvmvEQiI42JpbD8GlX xDqIDRaGOBal5AblftBIsw5C80Br75A= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=fromorbit-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=pmvVYwMR; spf=none (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of david@fromorbit.com has no SPF policy when checking 209.85.210.172) smtp.mailfrom=david@fromorbit.com; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1666231496; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=C5913yuT7OHnydXh0goEOs2trFBFfmtyAZq5Ppe1lGY=; b=ConxtOcUgmNJ35bASmckJ0+H3hjQog9xiCr4MM4GJtIs9v/RAYNSTFkyi2fpTnRGK9FjY5 aRP1oR5/MPIkEuuRE8CXOEPSCG2xjRw+kl6Iut8KGd4mhtEZ+bw00J/+AA74Z59221mGN6 K3n1FCXiyfvoeIT0Gw/RxBwvlxUwG+k= X-Stat-Signature: ziy4cshwt364dnxbrnx8oqyjzxowuhb4 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BE188A0027 Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=fromorbit-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=pmvVYwMR; spf=none (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of david@fromorbit.com has no SPF policy when checking 209.85.210.172) smtp.mailfrom=david@fromorbit.com; dmarc=none X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-HE-Tag: 1666231496-504060 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 07:49:57AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 09:30:42AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 04:09:17AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:52:19AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:55 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:34:13PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:12 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:30:48PM +0800, zhaoyang.huang wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Zhaoyang Huang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bellowing RCU stall is reported where kswapd traps in a live lock when shrink > > > > > > > > superblock's inode list. The direct reason is zombie page keeps staying on the > > > > > > > > xarray's slot and make the check and retry loop permanently. The root cause is unknown yet > > > > > > > > and supposed could be an xa update without synchronize_rcu etc. I would like to > > > > > > > > suggest skip this page to break the live lock as a workaround. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, the underlying bug should be fixed. > > > > > > > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > Understand. IMHO, find_get_entry actruely works as an open API dealing > > > > with different kinds of address_spaces page cache, which requires high > > > > robustness to deal with any corner cases. Take the current problem as > > > > example, the inode with fault page(refcount=0) could remain on the > > > > sb's list without live lock problem. > > > > > > But it's a corner case that shouldn't happen! What else is going on > > > at the time? Can you reproduce this problem easily? If so, how? > > > > I've been seeing this livelock, too. The reproducer is, > > unfortunately, something I can't share - it's a massive program that > > triggers a data corruption I'm working on solving. > > > > Now that I've > > mostly fixed the data corruption, long duration test runs end up > > livelocking in page cache lookup after several hours. > > > > The test is effectively writing a 100MB file with multiple threads > > doing reverse adjacent racing 1MB unaligned writes. Once the file is > > written, it is then mmap()d and read back from the filesystem for > > verification. > > > > THis is then run with tens of processes concurrently, and then under > > a massively confined memcg (e.g. 32 processes/files are run in a > > memcg with only 200MB of memory allowed). This causes writeback, > > readahead and memory reclaim to race with incoming mmap read faults > > and writes. The livelock occurs on file verification and it appears > > to be an interaction with readahead thrashing. > > > > On my test rig, the physical read to write ratio is at least 20:1 - > > with 32 processes running, the 5s IO rates are: > > > > Device tps MB_read/s MB_wrtn/s MB_dscd/s MB_read MB_wrtn MB_dscd > > dm-0 52187.20 3677.42 1345.92 0.00 18387 6729 0 > > dm-0 62865.60 5947.29 0.08 0.00 29736 0 0 > > dm-0 62972.80 5911.20 0.00 0.00 29556 0 0 > > dm-0 59803.00 5516.72 133.47 0.00 27583 667 0 > > dm-0 63068.20 5292.34 511.52 0.00 26461 2557 0 > > dm-0 56775.60 4184.52 1248.38 0.00 20922 6241 0 > > dm-0 63087.40 5901.26 43.77 0.00 29506 218 0 > > dm-0 62769.00 5833.97 60.54 0.00 29169 302 0 > > dm-0 64810.20 5636.13 305.63 0.00 28180 1528 0 > > dm-0 65222.60 5598.99 349.48 0.00 27994 1747 0 > > dm-0 62444.00 4887.05 926.67 0.00 24435 4633 0 > > dm-0 63812.00 5622.68 294.66 0.00 28113 1473 0 > > dm-0 63482.00 5728.43 195.74 0.00 28642 978 0 > > > > This is reading and writing the same amount of file data at the > > application level, but once the data has been written and kicked out > > of the page cache it seems to require an awful lot more read IO to > > get it back to the application. i.e. this looks like mmap() is > > readahead thrashing severely, and eventually it livelocks with this > > sort of report: > > > > [175901.982484] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: > > [175901.985095] rcu: Tasks blocked on level-1 rcu_node (CPUs 0-15): P25728 > > [175901.987996] (detected by 0, t=97399871 jiffies, g=15891025, q=1972622 ncpus=32) > > [175901.991698] task:test_write state:R running task stack:12784 pid:25728 ppid: 25696 flags:0x00004002 > > [175901.995614] Call Trace: > > [175901.996090] > > [175901.996594] ? __schedule+0x301/0xa30 > > [175901.997411] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x90 > > [175901.998513] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xb/0x90 > > [175901.999578] ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 > > [175902.000714] ? xas_start+0x53/0xc0 > > [175902.001484] ? xas_load+0x24/0xa0 > > [175902.002208] ? xas_load+0x5/0xa0 > > [175902.002878] ? __filemap_get_folio+0x87/0x340 > > [175902.003823] ? filemap_fault+0x139/0x8d0 > > [175902.004693] ? __do_fault+0x31/0x1d0 > > [175902.005372] ? __handle_mm_fault+0xda9/0x17d0 > > [175902.006213] ? handle_mm_fault+0xd0/0x2a0 > > [175902.006998] ? exc_page_fault+0x1d9/0x810 > > [175902.007789] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 > > [175902.008613] > > > > Given that filemap_fault on XFS is probably trying to map large > > folios, I do wonder if this is a result of some kind of race with > > teardown of a large folio... > > > > I somewhat recently tracked down a hugepage/swap problem that could > manifest as a softlockup in the folio lookup path (due to indefinite > folio_try_get_rcu() failure): > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220906190602.1626037-1-bfoster@redhat.com/ > > It could easily be something different leading to the same side effect, > particularly since I believe the issue I saw was introduced in v5.19, > but might be worth a test if you have a reliable reproducer. Tests run and, unfortunately, that patch doesn't prevent/fix the problem either. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com