linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/huge_memory: Do not clobber swp_entry_t during THP split
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:18:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221019161810.7510df1f37658a2b71c5e3a7@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbLzkras5SV95-J4r=nbGx5u_5JS2u8KG=23hzVvFBqCnMA5g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:17:14 -0700 Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The intent of commit b653db77350c patch was to avoid the case where
> > PG_private is clear but folio->private is not-NULL. However, THP tail
> > pages uses page->private for "swp_entry_t if folio_test_swapcache()" as
> > stated in the documentation for struct folio. This patch only clobbers
> > page->private for tail pages if the head page was not in swapcache and
> > warns once if page->private had an unexpected value.
> 
> It looks like the same issue fixed by
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220906190602.1626037-1-bfoster@redhat.com/

It is.

As I asked earlier this week, what about reverting b653db77350c?  Why
do we care about the value of ->private for non-PG_private pages?


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-19 13:41 Mel Gorman
2022-10-19 18:17 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-19 23:18   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2022-10-20  8:52     ` Mel Gorman
2022-10-20 13:10       ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221019161810.7510df1f37658a2b71c5e3a7@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox