From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532ADECAAA1 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 22:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B2C518022F; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:21:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id ADC1380224; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:21:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9CB658022F; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:21:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF8780224 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 18:21:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6913C1C6367 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 22:21:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79879453164.23.B193B47 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6312F2005F for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 22:21:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1662416461; x=1693952461; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0KJ1X0d+ghH08Og6OhWwp+HwtemNrkvvpJiE5KXax78=; b=HiAsDrI0RwrHRca8uF3SDncY4WGtRYqlgsRtDzMhWrMqE+9IQcRoowuy lS82lpikhZD3HARbsiTdhE0J+En32f+4fC7DyArRCSGUXoouzQskLYPQn bcpvoar/y7n/KQ7Xc7iu/OIkXRzUFebKsWmqUiky/sW4EZO80nRvYL1be jZg/3v78R65NOywWNbY++AAz2yHGEnrSIc7zvE9whRj8jyq2OYa/Tqlbx JRmns3FqH/EiiK+B95H4CvV/jIl3fYIneKjJ0GFcz0CpcWcUlnEkrm4Q4 YodUZcTH9KV3MnjuH3WDr+3T55kCTYJF2E5P8K+4qDICvYWtgXn0L2xkI w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10461"; a="276198296" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,292,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="276198296" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2022 15:20:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,292,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="591039129" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 95dfd251caa2) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2022 15:20:56 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 95dfd251caa2 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oVKSe-0004Zx-0Q; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 22:20:56 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 06:20:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Oscar Salvador , Andrew Morton Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Eric Dumazet , Waiman Long , Suren Baghdasaryan , Marco Elver , Andrey Konovalov , Alexander Potapenko , Oscar Salvador Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm, page_owner: Add page_owner_stacks file to print out only stacks and their counter Message-ID: <202209060655.H9CK1KgC-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220905031012.4450-3-osalvador@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220905031012.4450-3-osalvador@suse.de> ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=HiAsDrI0; spf=softfail (imf03.hostedemail.com: 192.55.52.136 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lkp@intel.com) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF" header.from=intel.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1662416462; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=StzzXw3MJoOc6PXZ92w4gFVP4QBqngHI9Tn4CO8bsbCvbtzupZpofW409vqj3lY1nTX3v4 GNdLj+d9OmaMJ2E8EXYoo6vabYIKuYwVC+onk9WAI+3QwHjau4nptLhLGxxrha6ULiOfp7 66dCA1/G5lqy8+jwxkkhB98N+g4JRaI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1662416462; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=fSOX5kgTZT2J2q2qtAOxFJBHXGtNff29R0AZkkSYN5M=; b=k2j0MtFzpCue+hoGqu1dZipxj/9lhCErJH604oa5hwa3HbsFbMVEAPefn7Kj0GXQXlV17y Idnd71oV6Fp/BjtCWTuoWj3PSzHPgUOext1548TO8BoV7hXBVU3rkRaYTiys7KBT6ljn+K R2Bjo7bTDT3zw0Scbng0I1hClbc9LkM= X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=HiAsDrI0; spf=softfail (imf03.hostedemail.com: 192.55.52.136 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lkp@intel.com) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF" header.from=intel.com (policy=none) X-Stat-Signature: nqtjc5pcwmijncgbf55fhbdi7rmgwtru X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6312F2005F X-HE-Tag: 1662416461-597598 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Oscar, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on v6.0-rc4] [cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-everything next-20220901] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Oscar-Salvador/page_owner-print-stacks-and-their-counter/20220905-111139 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 7e18e42e4b280c85b76967a9106a13ca61c16179 config: microblaze-randconfig-m041-20220905 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220906/202209060655.H9CK1KgC-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: microblaze-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot smatch warnings: lib/stackdepot.c:586 stack_depot_print_stacks_threshold() warn: unsigned 'stack->size' is never less than zero. vim +586 lib/stackdepot.c 568 569 int stack_depot_print_stacks_threshold(char *buf, size_t size, loff_t *pos) 570 { 571 int i = *pos, ret = 0; 572 struct stack_record **stacks, *stack; 573 static struct stack_record *last = NULL; 574 unsigned long stack_table_entries = stack_hash_mask + 1; 575 576 /* Continue from the last stack if we have one */ 577 if (last) { 578 stack = last->next; 579 } else { 580 new_table: 581 stacks = &stack_table[i]; 582 stack = (struct stack_record *)stacks; 583 } 584 585 for (; stack; stack = stack->next) { > 586 if (!stack->size || stack->size < 0 || -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp